10. Circle of Self-Control
Spiritual Web Chat
Session 1: Sat 25 Apr 1998
Ben< ALL: Tonight I have an introductory experiment, or exercise, to
help establish the frame of reference for this series of seminars. Some
of you may be far beyond this point, but I think it is a useful place to
start and also to review and remember.
Ben< ALL: This is the exercise: Sit up straight. Close your eyes. Touch
the tip of your nose with one finger. Now ... where is that point of contact
on the tip of your nose, relative to your center of awareness? Forward,
yes, but is it also somewhat up or down? And then also notice, is it slightly
to the left or right? YOUR TURN
the_Muse< Somewhat down. *s*
Lor< I find it to be centered, but just slightly lower (down by about
a 15 degree angle).
Ben< Lor: In my case, from my center of awareness, the tip of my nose
is about 35 degrees down, and neither left nor right.
Azriel< It becomes a focus of awareness, but there is still an inner
'movement' -- a broader sense of self.
Polgara< The point becomes my "awareness".
Ben< Polgara: Okay. Let's see what happens with the next phase of the
experiment. (To be posted fairly shortly)
Jello< Depends on mind state. Centering Aikido style makes "self
location" expand, even though mind itself is a point. (Without that
particular activity, Ben's description is close to mine.) Very different
feeling depending on where I put my mind and its focus. *S*
Cassandra< My point of contact feels a little down and slightly to the
left.
Blueiris< Up and to the left.
Ben< ALL: Now touch the tops of both your ears, and notice where they
are, relative to your center of awareness. (You can tap on them a little,
if you wish, to help focus your attention.) They are probably to the right
and left, of course, but are they also somewhat up or down? And then also
notice, are they slightly toward the front or the back of your head? YOUR
TURN.
Azriel< Again, with touch, a slightly more pronounced part of the whole.
FRAML< Directly opposite, same as with nose. I'm splitting the plane.
the_Muse< The top of my ears are in the field of my awareness, neither
up nor down, right nor left. Rather an encompassing line.
Jello< the_Muse: That sounds sort of like me with the altered mind-set,
I think. No real direction, but within "my awareness".
the_Muse< Jello: That is the feel of it, yes!
Redhawk< Ben: Feels 'inside' my center of awareness. Odd ...
Cassandra< My ears feel just a teeny bit below and more to the front.
Lor< I find my ears to be centered, but slightly above my center of awareness
(which seems to be even with the center on my ears).
greyman< Interesting ... from the inside and just slightly beyond my
head, all around.
LadyV< I am still struggling with the term "field of awareness"
to me it means one thing, and might not mean that to another.
Yopo< Hmm ... Interesting. I am not directly on a plane with my primary
senses.
In2light< In this context, ears would be slightly back and slightly down,
nose down and center.
Ben< ALL: Okay. If you had a three-dimensional drawing of your head,
and drew those three lines backward, one from the tip of your nose and one
from the top of each ear, would the lines intersect somewhere in your head?
YOUR TURN.
MonaHawke< Nope.
Jello< Only if I'm not in the altered mind-set are there real lines that
really intersect in a meaningful way. But it's much more distracting, so
it's harder to be that way. (er, it's distracting to touch both ears AND
the nose at the same time, which is what I tried.)
Ben< In my case, those lines intersect at a point in the center of my
head, slightly below and slightly forward of the tops of my ears. This is
my usual center of awareness. It is not always in precisely the same place,
but this is where I normally sit.
the_Muse< Ben: I think you are talking about a certain gland? *S*
Ben< the_Muse: Perhaps. However, it isn't the same for everyone, as we
have seen.
In2light< Ben: Agreed.
Yopo< "I" seem to be somewhere slightly below the tips of my
ears but a bit above my eyes.
Lor< Ben: Yes, I get the feeling that the lines would connect to the
center point of my "awareness".
SLIDER< Ben: The lines crossed where my fingers hit -- wasn't exactly
on the tips of my ears, though.
Yopo< I just closed my eyes and turned my head. My position seems to
wobble a bit. Not at the center of my physical axis.
Polgara< I'm with Jello. I got confused and lost my balance. It was scary!
Jello< Yeah, at this point I lost my center and my normal non-centered
focus, and I'm pretty confused.
greyman< Jello: Yeah, like you're aware of being aware! Sort of like
looking between two parallel mirrors back at yourself.
MonaHawke< Ben: Sorry, you said draw a line directly back? If all three
lines went directly backward how would they intersect? Lost me on the visual.
Ben< MonaHawke: I meant for you to draw the line from your nose to your
center of awareness, instead of the other direction, that's all.
MonaHawke< The word 'duh' comes to mind. LOL
Redhawk< Ben: It's moving around some. *laugh* Doesn't want to be 'assigned'
a 'place'.
Yopo< Redhawk: Best fasten your seat-belt! *s*
MonaHawke< Actually the answer is still no for me. Feels like mine is
somewhat outside of my head, which some folks who know me would get a good
chuckle out of.
greyman< MonaHawke: That is my mantra! LOL.
Ben< ALL: The point of this exercise is: Every circle and every sphere
has a center. My center of awareness is the center of my circle or sphere
of self-control.
Cassandra< Ben: Does this exercise usually make inside of your head tingle?
[Ben< Cassandra: No... but apparently it did yours. That's interesting.]
the_Muse< These differences in awareness focal point are very surprising
to me.
Jello< the_Muse: Difference between people, or between perceptions during
different "mind states"?
Ben< ALL: Okay, to explain. This exercise isn't as trivial as it may
seem. It is an exercise in concentration, focus, self-awareness, self-realization,
orientation. Something like it is found in many disciplines, including Kriya
and Raja Yoga.
the_Muse< Move inward to a small point, then move outward to become one
with the wind and the earth. The first gates.
Ben< the_Muse: Yes. *smile*
Yopo< Ben: What is this center point we just tried to locate?
Ben< Yopo: It is where *you* are (now) in 3-d space-time. It is also
called "the seat of the soul" although that implies a more permanent
location, and as we shall see (perhaps next session), we can not only expand
and contract our awareness, we can move.
Ben< ALL: For those who found your awareness encompassing an area, instead
of being more focused at a point, the next discipline would be concentration
(reduction of the radius).
Jello< Although the "distributed feeling" is supposed to be
a result of placing one's center at one's "centrum" or "one
point", I find that reducing focus increases awareness. As you grow
smaller, you grow bigger. If that makes sense.
the_Muse< Jello: It sure does. Moving inward to the cosmic spaces between
the atoms of your being. Inner/outer space.
SLIDER< Jello: That came to me in a dream one night -- focus on one small
point of being, and things just start to expand from there!
Ben< Jello: Moving point-of-awareness to the Aikido "one point"
comes somewhat later in the program. First, it is best to be at home in
your own head. That is also the best place to come back to, as long as we
are incarnate.
Jello< Ben: I guess flexibility and practice are ideal. While I still
don't know where's the best place to be, learning the various steps seems
like the best way to find out.
Ben< Jello: Yes. Learning what we can do. I find it interesting and exciting.
Then we can decide what we want to do with these capabilities.
Pogo< Interesting to find that my center of awareness was out in front,
somewhere near my forehead. After reading the posts, I attempted to center
my awareness further back in my head, and succeeded! Didn't know that could
be done.
Redhawk< Ben: Why practice making it smaller, precise? Just to be able
to exert conscious control? Expanding feels easier than reducing "center
of awareness".
Ben< Redhawk: Expanding and concentrating awareness are both useful skills.
Redhawk< Ben: OK.
Blueiris< Concentration of awareness feels fuzzy. Reduction of radius
feels uncomfortable. hmmmm
FRAML< Ben: That also sounds like establishing an anchor point if one
would ever find themselves suddenly out of body.
Yopo< FRAML: An interesting point. I think I'll try Ben's experiment
while dreaming.
Ben< FRAML: Yes, an anchor point, or home-base.
the_Muse< Ben: It really helps me to have a "spot" to do this
exercise.
SLIDER< Ben: I find if I concentrate too much on my center knowing one
place, I get stale -- then restless.
greyman< SLIDER: I fall asleep.
Ben< ALL: Now, then, a perennial question for each of us: "What
can I do (and not do) from here?" As an often-repeated question, it
can lead to a lifetime of exploration, development, and reality-testing
of our own capabilities.
MonaHawke< Everything.
Azriel< Chakras!
Ben< We have already touched on the possibilities of concentration and
expansion. (Barely touched them. Practice makes better, if not perfect).
Pogo noticed that he or she could move within his or her head. Okay! Later,
one may learn how to move to other places in the body (or elsewhere) and
safely return to home base.
Jello< Though I think it may never be safe to do too much of that while
incarnate in a neurochemically unstable body.
the_Muse< Ben: The most useful thing I have gotten from this exercise
is the improvement in my ability to hear the still small voice of both my
higher self and the spirit and even sometimes (rare occasions) the Creator.
Yopo< I suppose the first thing we do is what we do all the time: Look
out through our eyes, listen through our ears, etc. It's interesting, though,
to think of oneself as sort of riding around in the body as if it were a
vehicle. Establishes a distinction of some sort.
FRAML< Yopo: Good analogy.
the_Muse< Another thing I have gotten from this exercise is the ability
to control my inner vision as a form of astral travel.
Lor< Ben: I tried to move my center, but have not been able to do that.
Should I be able to?
Ben< Lor: No, not necessarily. This is just exploration of possibilities,
potential capabilities. "Should" isn't in these exercises.
SLIDER< Ben: I'm starting to follow your method of approach now; good
way to start this session. *S*
the_Muse< On further reflection, the going inward (gate one) promotes
hearing and the going outward (gate two) promotes vision. hmmm
Ben< ALL: Now, let's notice how we can focus our awareness (selectively
pay attention) to various signals coming to us from our own mind and body.
Have you ever paid so much attention to what you were reading that you didn't
hear someone speak to you? Have you ever, like the legendary absent-minded
professor, paid so much attention to what you were thinking that you tripped
over a crack in the sidewalk? Do you have any other examples like this?
YOUR TURN.
Lor< Yes, I have done both. My Number 3 Daughter does the former to extreme;
it even becomes a chore sometimes to get her attention at all!
Jello< I'm disconcerted that I'll suddenly realize I've driven a mile
and have no recollection of controlling the steering wheel.
Azriel< So focused on a thought while driving, you arrive at your destination
with no absolute recall of the drive!
LadyV< Azriel: Interesting. I've heard that one before ... makes one
wonder how automatic we are programmed.
Ben< Azriel: Yes, I used to commute between Washington, DC, and Philadelphia
-- and often only "woke up" at the toll booths.
Yopo< Just back from drumming circle. I often notice that by focusing
only on the auditory input, I become quite detached from my immediate surroundings.
MonaHawke< I 'tune out' all the time. Too focused on what I'm doing or
thinking about.
FRAML< Last week at work I was focusing on a difficult document and one
of our contractors came up behind me and said something, then laughed when
I literally jumped about 3 inches out of my chair.
Polgara< So focused on a client's story that I didn't think about checking
the time and ran 20 minutes over the 50 allotted for the session.
In2light< Painting, creating arts, even the TV. *s*
Yopo< In2light: Yeah! "Losing oneself" in a movie or book.
the_Muse< In2light: Ahhh, that is why I do not loose the awareness; my
creative endeavors are horse training and dance where I get very internally
focused while having to also be very externally focused. hmmmm
Jello< Jello's off in la-la land again.
LadyV< Jello: You seem to use the discipline that puts your center somewhere
else. "Where" may I ask? I am following some of what you are saying.
Not all.
windy< Azriel and Jello: I refer to such driving experiences as being
on autopilot.
Jello< windy: Yes, I use the term "autopilot" too, but I worry
when I'm not sure if someone else other than me has access to my autopilot.
Lor< I have "come to" when driving and thinking about something
and found myself lost -- not even recognizing where I was or how I got there!
A bit rather un-nerving !
Yopo< Lor: "Autopilot" seems to work well enough, so long as
an alarm beeps when a decision must be made. I've missed my own turnoffs
more than once. *s*
Lor< Yopo: I sense that I have trained my subconscious how to drive,
and it just takes over when I am on autopilot until my conscious mind decides
to interject a change.
windy< Lor: I think of driving without conscious thought as the body
trained to do its thing, even when the mind is occupied elsewhere.
SLIDER< Ben: I do it a lot of the time. I usually concentrate on what
I'm doing too much -- this is when my guardian angels save me from myself
sometimes.
Redhawk< Ben: My hearing is affected most. I don't 'hear' things when
focused. Something may come into my visual field, and it will register though
I may not respond. Hearing just seems to go.
Polgara< I find myself like Redhawk when I'm alone. The hearing goes,
but most everything else is on-line.
the_Muse< Ben: I have experienced time dilation, and contraction. Contraction
being like Azriel's point, a drive seeming way brief. And been in deep meditation
for what seemed hours leaving me refreshed and having visions and deep spirit
discussion in fifteen minutes. But I tend to be aware on a lot of levels,
so do not think I would be surprised by a person's voice.
Ben< ALL: This question is also not trivial. Though it may not be a good
tactic to "zone out" while driving a car, a very tight focus on
something else is how Yogis avoid awareness of physical pain. And they may
spend a lot of time and practice learning how to focus as tightly as some
of you have described -- to the exclusion of sensory inputs.
FRAML< Ben: Yes, it scares me when I do "tune out" while driving.
But I haven't practiced enough to focus on pain. That would really help
right now.
MonaHawke< FRAML: I learned to 'tune out' pain some time ago. It became
necessary when healing from certain physical ailments I was learning from.
Lor< FRAML: I think Ben's point was to NOT focus on the pain, but on
something else, so intensely that awareness of the pain disappears from
your consciousness.
Ben< FRAML: It doesn't help to focus on the pain. It only helps to focus
on something else.
FRAML< Ben: Ahhhhh, outside, like I do when they draw blood. OK.
Jello< Ben: But how do you focus when you are so tired that you can't
focus? Or if you are on medication, or are suffering an injury? I guess
the answer would be previous training, eh?
[Ben< Jello: Fatigue, medications, injuries, emotions, etc., can limit
one's ability to exercise self-control. Previous training and practice do
help in such situations.]
FRAML< Jello: I just count my blessings and go to sleep to get the rest.
SLIDER< Ben: I've never studied any yoga, but I have been through two
or more years of Bio-Feedback training to control pain without medication
-- and it does work!
windy< I find that "focusing" on the start of a migraine helps
me to stop it before it becomes a problem.
Redhawk< Ben: Good point. I was a ballet dancer for years, was always
surprised after performance/class to discover my toes bleeding inside my
pointe shoes, or to suddenly notice a sprain. Such concentration required
to execute physical moves with emotional intent that pain doesn't fit.
Azriel< I can 'split' from discomfort -- it's still there but no longer
a part of my physical self.
Blueiris< I have done the focusing during childbirth to facilitate easier
birthing.
Ben< ALL: Yes, the subconscious mind does function like an autopilot
-- which is very handy -- and it will help us to remember it works like
that.
Yopo< Autopilot doesn't pertain exclusively to physical activities. Seems
to me a lot of our mental activities are done on autopilot. Some thinking
processes, where we believe we are making conscious decisions, but instead,
we're just running pre-existing thought-programs.
Jello< Yopo: Yes, good point. Certainly we are often culturally programmed
to react automatically in some ways to certain things (like the word "Democracy"
or training in how to approach a math problem, etc.).
Emerald< Yopo: I agree. Someone once said that we are at our mental best
when we are "out of our mind", so to speak. I have had many of
these experiences, and must say that my thought process was much clearer
during them.
Ben< Yopo: Yes, indeed! And self-mastery involves conscious programming
and reprogramming our own subconscious autopilot.
Yopo< Ben: OH NO! I hope we don't have to learn to write "code".
*LOL*
Ben< Yopo: Yep. We need to learn how to "write code" that our
subconscious mind accepts and then operates. But all subconscious minds
don't assimilate COBOL.
Jello< Yopo: I think it's like web authoring these days: there are many
easy-to-use WYSIWYG interfaces we can use instead of having to learn what
to do from the circuits on up to HTML.
LadyV< Yopo: One of the signs of aging is when the autopilot misses a
few steps. Then, as children, the attention or focus has to be practiced
to rechannel the brain to go back on autopilot. Odd how we return as we
do.
MonaHawke< Yopo: Those patterns can wreak havoc on our lives, eh?
Yopo< MonaHawke: Yep. It's scary to think, too, that other folks can
insert their programs in our heads, if we don't pay attention.
Azriel< Yopo: When I'm in that state I think I'm less vulnerable. It's
the unfocused times when others could creep in!
greyman< Yopo: Just like going to the movie theater in the 50's with
subliminal messages to get more popcorn.
MonaHawke< Yopo: It's great when one can tune up their programming to
spot those programs of other's and block them out, too. A worthwhile project,
eh?
Yopo< MonaHawke: I'm workin' on it. *s*
In2light< the_Muse: I can feel this way with my car, with my house, etc..
You absolutely KNOW when something is different.
the_Muse< In2light: Yes! I think I learned it from horses. I have recommended
to people to go into a really good barn -- good as in, lovingly handled,
content horses as they eat their evening meal. Their chi is so powerful,
if you can tune in, they can really teach inner quiet.
the_Muse< Ben: When I am at peak performance with a horse, I loose the
sense of my body and my awareness moves out to include theirs: my hands
their front legs, and my legs their rear legs. I call it being in the zone.
LadyV< the_Muse: Now that does intrigue me. You are one with the animal.
Only an excellent rider feels the animal. Do you then have this feeling
with people ... may I ask?
the_Muse< LadyV: I have at one time trained a horse to do single stride
tiempes. That is when the horse appears to be skipping. I did it for twenty
strides on one occasion. In the Olympics the horse is asked for eight. It
was me skipping, us a pair. I have a good young horse that I have high hopes
for now. It is a wonderful split between going inside and going to that
outside place of no being. So hard to describe.
LadyV< the_Muse: Thank you. The animal feels you, and probably reads
your mind as well. Animals do this. Good for you. That would be a performance
to see. Simply put, you move your spirit outward; the animal joins you there.
Makes sense to me. Has to be a union, though ... and the young one you mentioned
is well bonded to you. Thank you for sharing that.
the_Muse< LadyV: It is real magic, I think, and I thank God that I have
been blessed to know it. I think animals taught me all my psychic skills,
really. They are so honest emotionally, they teach that the emotions are
a language.
Lor< I tend to think of aging as operating more and more on autopilot,
in the broader sense that Yopo indicated. I am consulting with a doctor
about the difficulty I have begun having with conscious thought. I find
such quite tiring -- mental fatigue, etc. However, I do not understand why
such should have an effect on my ability to recollect items stored in my
subconscious memory.
Jello< I think there is a difference between some points of "mindless
autopilot" and "aware autopilot." I don't like the former
when I am doing anything dangerous; the latter seems harder to achieve but
very nifty.
SLIDER< Jello: There is a lot of danger driving down the freeway and
forgetting how you got where you are ! *S*
Jello< SLIDER: Yup! That's what I'm calling "mindless autopilot"!
When you're not there. the_Muse's sounds like a vastly "aware"
situation; quite different.
Yopo< And yet, what Muse said about "mindlessness" and merging
with the task is similar. Sometimes I perform better when I just let a thing
happen, without conscious control. It seems a bit of a paradox.
Jello< Yopo: I think (may be wrong, of course) that there is an autopilot
that merges the consciousness into the whole, but there is also a version
in which the consciousness is off thinking about dinner instead.
the_Muse< Jello: It feels like a non-awareness. Self is just a point
in a large pool.
Jello< the_Muse: ... and the rest of the self isn't off thinking about
McDonald's or something.
Ben< ALL: Okay, 'tis the end of the hour. If you like, I have another
question for discussion. If not, feel free to continue along present lines.
Blueiris< Ben: Please go on.
Yopo< Ben: Yes. Please continue!
Pogo< Ben: Please do ask the next question.
Ben< ALL: Okay, just for fun, lets share some personal examples of things
we can (and cannot) get our own physical bodies to do. For example, I recall
how pleased I was when I learned to ride a bicycle, and the first time I
realized that I can stand flat-footed and touch an eight-foot-high ceiling.
Conversely, I cannot carry a tune. I can "make a joyful noise"
but people cover their ears and ask me please to stop. If you would, please
share some examples of what you can and cannot get your physical body to
do. YOUR TURN
Jello< Can't fly by flapping the ol' arms! Learned that one as a very
small kid!
Ben< Jello: *LOL* I tried that, too. Required several Band-Aids, because
I am persistent. (Okay, then, stubborn.)
greyman< Jello: I remember the first time I flew out of body (about 3
years old).
Willow< *!*
Jello< I suppose some can supposedly do impossible things like walk on
water or even telekinesis or such, but flying by flapping still sounds like
fiction to me.
grunblau< During the dead of winter, when I am outside, I can imagine
the sun or a very warm place -- say the desert -- and feel warmer. And the
opposite is true: when sweaty and hot in a summer day, I can think of the
winter and be cooler.
Ben< grunblau: Good examples. The body automatically responds to the
subconscious mind, and the subconscious mind accepts auto-suggestion from
the conscious mind.
Emerald< Ben: I cannot juggle. *S*
[Ben< Emerald: I almost can. My son has been trying to teach me to juggle.
*S*]
Blueiris< Can roll my R's but can't do the splits. *g*
Ben< Blueiris: I could probably do the splits -- once! *LOL* Then major
repairs would no doubt be necessary.
Azriel< I love to dance!
Emerald< Azriel: As do I! And sing, too!
Pogo< I can run slowly. But I cannot run fast.
SLIDER< I wish I could see through the hillsides with x-ray vision and
find gold. No luck so far! LOL
Yopo< I cannot seem to "turn off" my body's allergic responses
to certain common things: some perfumes, some pollen. The allergic responses
serve no useful purpose.
LadyV< Yopo: Wanta bet? (laughing) The body is telling you to avoid the
whatever.
the_Muse< Yopo: I had hay fever something awful 'till I got some local
bee pollen and took a teaspoon a day for six months. It cured it. Several
years later I realized I no longer had the problem. I gave it to a few family
members and it did the same for them. A really amazing cure.
Yopo< the_Muse: Bee pollen. Hmm. I've never heard a bee sneeze, come
to think of it. *s*
Azriel< Yopo: ROFL!!!!
the_Muse< Yopo: It really worked! And it tastes good.
Blueiris< So, for allergy to cedar pollen, should I chew some bark? *G*
Too bad it's not a juniper allergy -- I could just drink some gin, eh? LOL
Jello< Yopo: I've heard about taking bee pollen, too. Local pollen, contained
in beeswax or whatever; consume carefully.
KatZenBou< The allergies come from local pollen in the air; consumed
internally, pollen has a homeopathic affect. The bees gather the local pollen,
you take it and have a resistance from within.
the_Muse< KatZenBou: *smile*
Redhawk< I can do a double pirouette routinely but triples only on occasion.
Why? Balance for two is the same as balance spot for three -- but my mind
says "Three is too hard" and I fall off balance. *s*
the_Muse< I haven't touched my toes since grade school -- those shrunken
ham strings. I can't abide a rude dog. Oh, Ben, this is a weird thing: when
I meet people in person, I can't help but take on the behavior they expect
of me. I am afraid of crowds. The energies of all the emotions are so hard
to tune out.
windy< I am much better at video games when I distract my conscious mind
and play intuitively.
FRAML< When I was in the Army, I once convinced six of my soldiers that
it was safe to go off the 60 foot rappelling tower. The only person I didn't
convince was myself, I went down about 10 feet and then CLIMBED back up
the face of the tower. The safety NCO couldn't believe I did it -- the planks
were too close together. I've never overcome a fear of falling, though heights
don't bother me. Oh, yes, was scared s***less on a cable car ride at Garmish.
SLIDER< FRAML: That's a good point -- fear can be a good distracter from
the physical senses!!
Yopo< Music is interesting. Learning seems to be a process below (or
above) normal consciousness. Sometimes I just watch my fingers moving on
the frets, and sometimes am surprised when they do something I've never
thought about before. Then, I try to tell my fingers to do something I HAVE
thought about, and they refuse. *LOL*
Lor< Yopo: I would be wary of watching my fingers doing something I did
not command or never thought about before, for fear some unwelcome spirit
had taken over part of me. I also would be wary of inviting spirits in to
do such without being very careful about their motivations and ethics.
the_Muse< Lor: I have my doubts that most people honestly evaluate their
own inner honesty and ethics, so I wonder how one might judge a discarnate
being? It would not be verifiable that they walk their talk.
Yopo< Lor: I think it is probably a common experience to most musicians.
My thought is that there is a part of the unconscious mind that comprehends
music on a level that the conscious mind does not. And then there's the
whole issue of creative inspiration. None knows who whispers in a poet's
ear. I don't worry, as there is no "bargain" involved. No deals
done at the crossroads. *smile*
Redhawk< Yopo: Yep, I believe you're right about musicians. It's kind
of like you become part of the whole musical piece, and are moved to play
these notes in this rhythm.
Azriel< I sometimes have a very visceral warning response on first contact
with some people that has held true with time!
Emerald< Azriel: I have had "warnings" as well, and I heed
them.
Blueiris< Sometimes in emergencies my conscious mind goes AWOL and my
subconscious takes over and does an excellent job.
MonaHawke< Well, an interesting question would be: "How did consciousness
materialize and become the body"? In Buddhist thought, matter arises
from desire, and desire looks for and finds fulfillment through repeated
experience. Repetition appears as a frequency or vibration pattern. So we
create these patterns within ourselves and they become our reality ... IMHO
... including all the things that seem outside of our consciousness.
Yopo< MonaHawke: Interesting. It strikes me that there is some sort of
two-way process involved. Things the body does can manifest into a spiritual
"structure" and things the spirit does can manifest into the physical
body. I'm not altogether sure if either has primacy.
MonaHawke< Yopo: Consciousness can become addicted to physical form or
the desire to have something rather than nothing. In the overmind, nothing
exists; in the undermind all matter exists. Interesting balancing act.
Pogo< Ben: Okay, so we can do some things, and not do others. The point
is, what?
Ben< Pogo: Thank you for returning to the question I posted! // ALL:
the point of this exercise is, a human body and brain is a wonderful vehicle
and instrument for the spirit (soul). It isn't without limits (none of them
are), but it is not to be despised.
Cassandra< I can't make my body do anything. So I feel rather left out.
It manages by itself, though.
Yopo< Cassandra: *smile* Oftentimes spirit shines brightly through the
physical limitations of the body.
Azriel< Yopo: Unfortunately, we too often focus on those limitations
rather than the endless possibilities! *S*
greyman< Cassandra: You have a daughter, right?
Cassandra< greyman: Yes, I have a daughter.
greyman< Cassandra: Ahhh, good! My memory serves me. These days I need
to verify. You guide and direct your child. When you do this, do you feel
a caring bond between yourself and her?
Cassandra< greyman: Yes, of course. I love my children and want them
to become decent men and women who will respect the rights of others and
be true to the Spirit within.
greyman< Cassandra: Your statement alone is a testament of your spiritual
purpose, and desire for their well being. What is more important: moving
your "will" to some point in space, or using your "will"
to raise beautiful souls? *G*
Cassandra< greyman: You got me! I never thought of it like that. Thank
you and Bless you.
greyman< Cassandra: My pleasure to help!
LadyV< Ben: Thanks for an interesting evening. Your questions caused
me to consider. As always, I had to put them through my frame of reference
and ponder them ... and I will in the future ... while carefully trying
not to put my foot in my mouth. What does intrigue me is how very different
we perceive; that amazes me. Enjoyed it all. Thank you for the time spent
in helping us along the road.
[Ben< LadyV: You're welcome. *smile* I have also enjoyed this evening.]
SLIDER< Ben: What about involuntary response to physical senses when
one does not think of the consequences -- or whether one action may be more
favorable than another? For example: I never thought I'd jump from a moving
chopper at about twenty feet elevation -- until it started taking hits.
Then I didn't think about the jump, I just did it -- I was more worried
about going down in a burning chopper!
Ben< SLIDER: I plan to look at stimulus-response and conditioned-response
later. (Conditioned-responses have saved the lives of many soldiers, as
you know, and many other people as well.)
windy< SLIDER: Indeed, that is the whole point of training the body ...
so it can react properly, accurately, and swiftly. I would think dancers
and fighters would be most aware this, as well as athletes, musicians, etc.
It is my belief that one's body can also utilize the talents of one's ancestors
via the genes, but one has to be able to draw them out (unfortunately there
are unscrupulous individuals and groups who do so through hypnotism and
drugs).
SLIDER< Ben: Conditioned-response and stimulus-response should be a good
topic then. Thanks.
Ben< SLIDER: windy just described the value of conditioned-response very
nicely. I'll look at it in more detail.
SLIDER< Yes, Ben, and Thank you, windy. I will look forward to that session
-- it will get into much more, I'm sure.
Azriel< Many thanks, Ben, a really interesting mental warm up -- can't
wait for the aerobics!
Ben< ALL: Another point in this exercise is: one of the things I can
do, here and now, is to practice a rigorous inner honesty concerning my
capabilities -- not deceiving myself in either direction -- and still appreciate
the beauty and utility of this body and mind without being or becoming a
slave to it. See?
Blueiris< ahhh ~~ so it is good to remember the body and brain do have
some limits. That will help to give respect to the physical for all it can
do. *G*
LadyV< Ben: Read in a book recently that the body is the angel for the
soul ... liked that myself. Some disciplines teach us to love the body and
thank it daily for the house ... the point is well taken that you have said.
windy< I think the soul is like an angel to the body. In fact, I believe
many "angels" are people living today whose souls are "evolved"
enough to travel about, to extend themselves, so to speak ... adding a whole
new dimension to the concept of "autopilot".
Blueiris< Much to ponder ~ much to practice.
the_Muse< Ben: Are you going to go into inner honesty tonight, or next
week?
Ben< the_Muse: Inner honesty will be a theme throughout this series,
though I don't know how often I'll mention it.
the_Muse< Ben: The way I keep an eye on myself is by listening for "But".
You know: "I know this is mean, but ..." or "I know I should
do that, but ..." or "I know I should go back and give the teller
her pen, but ..."
SLIDER< the_Muse: That sounds like the same way I listen to myself --
I think sometimes someone else is doing the talking and I'm listening. *S*
Yopo< Ben: Thanks for a most interesting session! I like the direction
your new topic is moving in. *smile*
Emerald< Goodnight to all, and thank you, Ben, for a wonderful discussion.
I look forward to more!
Yopo< Hope the proposed system upgrade TheFire mentioned doesn't leave
this place unstable for too long. Well, with luck, SWC will only hiccup
and blink out for 12 hours. Hope TheFire is having better luck with his
request for donations now. Keeping this place up and running must cost a
bundle!
LadyV< Yopo: Who donates? I wondered about that. I wish him well also
... really do. He will find a way.
Yopo< LadyV: I guess TheFire put out a request to all SWC members, to
help financially if they are able. Would you believe there are 20,000 members?
Oddly, though, I received no such direct solicitation. Only found out about
it because of a post Walter left here in Amazon some weeks back. I am wondering
if the request somehow misfired, and no one got it.
LadyV< Yopo: I never heard that. Interesting. Don't see why not. hummm
... misplaced somewhere ... had to be. TheFire comes on-line and all of
us welcome him. A little PR would go a long way.
Gracie< Ben: Do you think conditioned response is a "good"
thing?
Ben< Gracie: Conditioned-response *can* be a good thing, but it is not
always good or bad for us.
Gracie< Ben: Under what circumstances is it a "good" thing?
Ben< Gracie: As windy said earlier, training to the point of conditioned-response
is essential for folks like firefighters and rescue crews, and the rest
of us, too, when it is something like the proper reaction to a sudden situation
in traffic.
Gracie< Ben: Does that presuppose that we would not react appropriately
without conditioning?
Ben< Gracie: In emergency situations, conditioning is faster than a conscious
decision, and that may make all the difference.
Yopo< Ben: *LOL* I am trying to unlearn the response of pumping the brakes
in a skid. Anti-lock brakes have made an old conditioned response worse
than useless.
[Ben< Yopo: Good point. Most of us have old conditioned responses that
are now worse than useless. They are what we need to reprogram in our subconscious.]
SLIDER< Ben: How about an unconditioned response? Will you cover that
in the same seminar? Something like a sixth sense response that's spontaneous?
Ben< SLIDER: Yes, there are responses that aren't traceable to any conditioning
in this lifetime. That's another whole lobe of this subject area.
SLIDER< Ben: It should be an interesting seminar!
FRAML< Off-topic announcement: I won't be here next weekend. I'm going
on a 3 day terrain walk at Gettysburg Battlefield.
KatZenBou< FRAML: Is there any way to get permission to sleep the night
on the battlefield? That would perhaps be really something.
LadyV< KatZenBou: Now, that would be something. There is a ship in Corpus
Christi that is spooked in the engine room. Not a pleasant place to be ...
too sad. I bet that field would be full of spirits. FRAML would not disturb
them; he is far too polite. Not a problem. Oh, the ship is the Lady Lex
... just remembered.
FRAML< KatZenBou: We will be sleeping in the local National Guard Armory
in Gettysburg. I was invited to go by the Active Army folks at work who
are doing the trip as "professional development" for the Officers
and NCOs (all the platoon and master Sergeants).
LadyV< FRAML: You are going regular army?
FRAML< LadyV: The folks I'm going with are Regular Army people assigned
to the Army Declassification Activity where I work as a civilian. I'll be
the fat guy in blue jeans and an old tiger-striped boonie hat.
LadyV< FRAML: They won't notice. Seen the regulars lately? Just hold
your breath when you got to. You will do fine.
FRAML< LadyV: No amount of holding my breath will shrink this beer belly,
just diet and exercise (and the will power to do it).
LadyV< FRAML: Well, try mental picture ... don't be so tough on you ...
fiddle!
KatZenBou< We have a Spanish Mission here called La Purisima that is
supposed to have the spirit of a young man killed 250 years ago in a quarrel
over a woman. His body was hidden in a woodpile, and on certain nights it
is said to be seen walking around. It goes up the hill to where the large
cross is, where he and his lover used to steal away in the night. His lover
was told by the murdering rival that she had been abandoned by her lover,
so she took to the arms of the assassin in tears. He took advantage of her
and left her with child that night. He then left the area, and the body
was found a couple days later.
LadyV< KatZenBou: That's interesting. Have you ever seen him?
KatZenBou< No. I used to run at the mission often -- that is where I
got my first mouthful of cactus spines from the fruit. I also would go up
the hill to the cross in the August nights for the meteor showers. But I
never saw him, nor felt his presence. I have felt the presence of spirits
before, but not him. Maybe it is only the certain night he was killed.
LadyV< KatZenBou: Tragic.
KatZenBou< On one night each year there is a candlelight procession from
the wall of the woodpile to the top of the hill. I have never gone on it,
though.
LadyV< KatZenBou: It is kind of others to do that.
KatZenBou< We also have a local spirit who died in the thirties when
her car went over the cliff into the steep canyon a few hundred feet below.
I have been to the car. It is all rotted away, but pieces are there. Her
body was found, but her child was dragged away by coyotes. Her spirit is
said to come out on certain nights. She is a beat-up looking woman who asks
kids making out on the road to help her look for her child.
LadyV< KatZenBou: Now for that, I would call in a healer or whatever,
to ease that woman. That is so sad ...
KatZenBou< And once some cowboys robbed the local bank. They escaped
with a posse in pursuit. They winged one, but he got away. Several years
later the skeleton of the robber was found in the brush. He was left behind
by his comrades as they made their escape. He also is said to wander that
canyon.
LadyV< KatZenBou: You lead an interesting life ... did you know that?
I have missed your stories. Any replacement for Humprey?
KatZenBou< LadyV: No, the poor big guy. It is so sad not hearing him
calling to me, and all the times he would get out and scratch himself on
my truck. My wife feels it even more than me as she is here more. I am gone
so much, and she takes care of the animals.
LadyV< KatZenBou: I miss the stories about that boar. I got a new pup
that looks like a dinga. I carry her on my shoulder. She hops around like
LePew in the cartoons. She is miniature terrier ... oddest looking dog.
I got her from Mexico. She is gentle, but bonds and is protective.
KatZenBou< I had a girlfriend who said her house was haunted. She said
it was a sad but friendly male. A psychic came by one day and said that
the house is over what once was a creek, and that a shepherd from the 1700's
had been camping and was killed by robbers. Coyotes scattered his body,
but the skull was under the house in what had been the coyote burrow. He
was Catholic and wanted a proper burial. I checked city records and indeed
that area was once a creek that had been filled in the 30's.
LadyV< KatZenBou: Smart to check it out. Keeps the facts clear. God Bless
his soul.
Ben< KatZenBou: If you haven't seen Dr. Bill Baldwin's techniques manual
on Spirit Releasement Therapy, I think you would find it useful in cases
such as you have described.
KatZenBou< Ben: It is so good for you to have this course. I am sad that
I have missed so much the last month. I must find the archives.
Yopo< Ben: I was thinking of you last night at our local Gathering. A
young couple showed up, asking help with a "haunting" situation.
To my somewhat limited perception, it struck me that the young man was the
haunted party, and knows more than he's telling. I suspect he is an "attracter"
-- if that is the right term. The dynamics of the whole thing left me feeling
very disturbed, though I can't put my finger on just why.
Ben< Yopo: Yes, some folks do attract dark ones. And some attract lost
ones. Part of Spirit Releasement Therapy is in finding and mending the vulnerabilities,
but sometimes the person has to change something, like a desire or a set
of desires.
LadyV< Yopo: Mars on SWC ... the one that is about 95 percent correct
... says you have to create energy to attract. Guess that is what you mean.
Yopo< LadyV: There was something about this guy ... stressed out ...
a hopeless look in the eyes ... and a strong sense that he is hiding or
blocking something that the wife doesn't know. There is a 3-year-old daughter
in the situation who has been talking about this "man" in the
house, and about a "child" who is her friend. Something doesn't
wash.
LadyV< Yopo: You are probably correct. Wonder which one has the energy.
Maybe the wife. She was the stronger. hmm. Would make me a bit uncomfortable.
Yopo< My suspicions, which I dared not voice, had to do with the father's
relationship to the child, and the possibility of the wife/mother's blindness.
If you believe what they were saying, though, there is clearly some other
force that has entered into the situation. Physical damage to possessions
and the house itself, which seem hard to account for. I honestly don't know
if it's a job for family protective services, ghost-busters, or both. I
trust and respect the friend who went to their aid today. Sort of discussed
it with him after the folks had left, in very circumscribed terms.
LadyV< Yopo: I feel that you did what was right. At least you did something.
God save us from those that do nothing ... apathy hurts. Good for you, Yopo.
Yopo< LadyV: I didn't do much but fret. It occurred to me, though, that
dark things can be dark indeed. And sometimes we don't care to look into
that darkness. *sigh*
LadyV< Ben: Have you met Mars? This woman is remarkable ... blunt but
remarkable.
Ben< LadyV: Yes, I met Mars in an SWC chat the other night. She asked
me a couple of very good questions.
LadyV< Ben: She is real ... guess that is the best way to say it. Glad
you met her. She has strong feelings about what is appropriate. She does
not harm. She has been on similar missions as yourself. The difference is
that she earns an income, and I don't think that you do. Regardless, she
warns in here ... thus the bluntness ... and in my opinion, she is correct.
Good that you know her. I am glad.
KatZenBou< Ben: Are Dr. Baldwin's manuals on SWC somewhere?
Ben< KatZenBou: I have a couple of articles by Dr. Baldwin on my site,
under the "resources" button. One of them has his mailing address
and email address, and the phone number of his publisher.
KatZenBou< Great! Thanks, Ben. I will go to the site and check it out.
Love and Light to all of you.
Ben< ALL: Goodnight. And thanks to all who were here, for a most interesting
evening.
Yopo< Ben: A good night to ya. And thanks again!
10. Circle of Self-Control
Session 2: Sat 02 May 1998
Ben< Tonight we will continue to look within, at some of the many more-or-less
automatic systems in our physical bodies, to explore the hazy borderline
between involuntary reactions and voluntary self-control.
Ben< The first category is stimulus-response (reflex). These reactions
occur with no prior experience, and they normally occur every time a stimulus
is presented. One example is the knee-jerk reflex. Another is the reaction
that pulls your finger off a hot surface before you feel the pain. There
are many others, but the reflex I'd like to consider tonight is dilation
and contraction of the pupils of the eyes.
Ben< ALL: Can you control the pupils of your eyes at will? If so, how?
YOUR TURN
greyman< Ben: No bella donna tonite?
Ben< greyman: Hush! You know me too well, and for too long. *smile*
Trudy< Ben: hhhmmm ... didn't know that was possible. I sure can't. How?
FRAML< Ben: I've never tried the pupils, but right now I'm working on
the lids.
Ben< FRAML: One of my old professors recommended using toothpicks to
hold the lids up, but I never tried it.
polgara< Yes, Ben, I can ... but it's a bit personal how.
SLIDER< Ben: Don't think I have any control of my pupils.
polgara< I've found that if you think of things that will raise certain
responses in your system, you can expand and contract the pupils of your
eyes. Shining light in them will do the same thing, but thinking is easier
for me.
Ben< polgara: Okay, nothing personal is required here.
polgara< Good ... 'cause that's all the explanation I'll give! *S*
Ben< ALL: Yes, you can control the pupils of your eyes to some extent,
but not always. They react to light (physical), and to certain substances
(chemical), and to emotions (psychological). Let's look at the psychological
reactions.
Ben< Your pupils automatically dilate when you see something that you
believe is interesting or exciting. That's why professional card players
wear dark glasses, to prevent the other players from seeing their pupils
dilate when they look at a good hand of cards.
Ben< A small story: Long ago, men noticed (probably subconsciously, being
men) that if a girl's pupils were large when she looked at him, she was
interested, and therefore interesting. Girls noticed that girls with dilated
pupils received more than their share of male attention, so they found a
substance that dilates the pupils and put it their eyes to attain this desired
condition. The substance was named for it's use, and is still called "beautiful
lady" (Belladonna, also known as deadly nightshade, the source of atropine).
Ben< I knew a Yogi who could dilate and expand the pupils of his eyes
as commanded by another person who was watching him do it. I asked him how
he did that. He laughed and said, "It has nothing to do with the eyes.
To dilate them, I remember something I found interesting and exciting. To
contract them, I remember a time when I made an absolute fool of myself."
Ben< Homework: You can look at yourself in a mirror, shine a flashlight
in your eyes, and watch your pupils contract. Move the light away, and watch
your pupils dilate. Or you can ingest certain chemicals and see what they
do to your eyes (not recommended). Or you can select a specific memory,
dwell on it, and notice how your pupils react to the emotions that memory
invokes (recommended).
Ben< ALL: Now let's expand this discussion: Many bio-physical systems
are automatically self-regulating. They are basically involuntary, but we
can control them to some degree voluntarily. These systems include respiration,
circulation, digestion, perspiration, etc..
Ben< ALL: Can you control the rate of your heart-beat at will? If so,
how? YOUR TURN
polgara< Same way, Ben! Not with the flashlight, of course! LOL!
LadyV< Deep breathing and meditation helps. Exercise helps. Clean living
helps ... I think.
Lor< I have no idea whether I can or not, but I have heard that it can
be changed via biofeedback.
LadyV< Lor: Good one. That does work sometimes.
Ben< ALL: Sorry, I may have gotten a little ahead of myself by posting
that last question before asking for any comments concerning the pupils
of the eyes. Please feel free to address either of those subtopics.
Trudy< Ben: I can slow my heart-beat by meditating, slowing my breathing.
I can increase my heart rate by thinking of ... er ... certain things.
Ben< Trudy: *chuckle* Very tactful "... er ..."
SLIDER< Ben: The physical means of dilating the pupils I have done, no
chemical though, only at the eye doctors. As for the heart beat, I just
tell my heart to slow down when I think it is beating to fast. I learned
this in Biofeedback.
Ben< SLIDER: Yes, biofeedback can expand our control of many normally
automatic functions.
LadyV< The pupils of the eyes reflect the condition of the soul, in my
opinion. Fear reflects tight pupils, and rage is another, in the mentally
ill. Seldom does one see open pupils ... in an emotional sense, that is.
In a physical sense, in my view the explanation used is correct: one can
change the pupils by drugs and the amount of light entering into the eye.
For me the eyes are the soul. Closed pupils, I run. Simple as that.
Lor< Does the heart beat faster when a guy sees a girl with dilated eyes,
maybe?
[Ben< Lor: Yep! Nice double comment.]
LadyV< Then on the other hand, without eyes, the touch is what says it.
Off the subject here, but was considering.
Ben< ALL: It is always good to consider various possible causes of the
same effect: in these cases, physical, chemical, and emotional causes.
Jess< Ben: Forgive my ignorance, but what is biofeedback?
SLIDER< Jess: Biofeedback is a term used when one is taught how to control
pain or emotion using a type of electrical attachment while viewing a scope
that shows how the Alfa and Beta waves work in a person's brain. By consciously
watching the scope, one learns how to control the brain pattern that switches
certain neurons in the brain to help control mostly pain. I hope this helps
explain it a little.
Jess< SLIDER: Thank you for answering. Yes, helps. *S*
Ben< Jess: Another version of biofeedback is simply to listen to your
own heart with a stethoscope and notice how its beat changes in response
to what you are thinking about.
LadyV< Ben: No kidding! This is singular, not with others when we do
this ... be darned if I am not going to try that one.
5foot2< Ben: I can help the eye in transition from dilated to contracted
... to adjust quicker. And the heartbeat, yes, thanks to a misspent (but
a lot of fun) youth that often involved pretending to be asleep after climbing
the tree to get back into my room. I simply concentrate on my breathing,
and in my mind's eye I watch my belly slowly rise, the slower the belly
rise the slower my heart rate.
LadyV< 5 foot 2: Interesting. Wonder if Ma bought that one. (laughing)
Ben< To change the heart-rate, one can use physical exercise, or chemicals
like ammonia, or emotions like thinking of something interesting and exciting
-- or frightening, if you want to try that.
Ben< ALL: The second category is conditioned-response. These reactions
are developed over time, by subconscious association of stimuli with prior
experience. Perhaps the most famous example is Pavlov's puppies, but we
don't have to be a Pavlov or a puppy to experiment with conditioned-response.
Ben< ALL: An experiment: Think about pickles. Really think about pickles.
Mentally go to the refrigerator and take out a jar of pickles. Open the
jar. Smell the pickles. Take a pickle out of the jar. Pop the pickle into
your mouth. Bite it. Hear and feel it crunch. Taste the flavor. Chew and
swallow the pickle. Lick the pickle juice off your fingers. Now, while you
were going through this little mental exercise, did you actually salivate?
YOUR TURN
LadyV< Nope, just the biggest Pizza in town. (grinning)
polgara< Yup!
Lor< Yuk.
Ben< Lor: Yuk (?) Was it a *very sour* pickle? Sorry, I should have specified
a sweet pickle. However, some folks automatically think of dill pickles.
Lor< I prefer dills, actually. It's just that I have a problem controlling
my salivation. Too much is a nuisance, you know.
SLIDER< Ben: I love good pickles, and the mere thought makes my mouth
water!
Ben< SLIDER: Yes. That was the point of this experiment: the very *thought*
causes an actual biological reaction, with no pickles present.
Lor< What's happened to everyone? Did they all have to go for napkins?
polgara< I guess so, Lor! Either that or they ran for the real thing!
LOL!
LadyV< I am lost with the pickle. Guess it depends on what makes your
mouth water ... which I think Ben is saying we are capable of that.
Trudy< *grin* Okay, I'll confess. Pickles were one of my favorite things
as a kid, and yes, I still salivate when I think of them.
Lor< How does one keep from salivating when its not desired? Can thoughts
do that, too?
LadyV< Lor: If you figure a way to stop the natural process, we could
make millions! I would wonder also ... think it is how we are.
Lor< As a singer, I sometimes wish I could stop salivating.
LadyV< Lor: I see your point ... doubt anyone notices.
Lor< LadyV: LOL!
Ben< ALL: Consider the implications of this little experiment. To the
extent your thoughts produce real changes in your body (such as salivation),
you do, to that degree, create your own reality. But this experiment did
not effect external reality. Your thoughts did not create a refrigerator,
or a jar of pickles. There is a lesson here concerning the limits within
which we do and do not create our own reality.
Ben< ALL: Next question: Have you ever intentionally *created* a habit?
If so, please describe what it was and how you did it. YOUR TURN
Ben< FRAML: If you're awake, I must hasten to say "nun of that!"
greyman< Ben: Are you trying to get rid of that "habit". *G*
Polgara< Ben: My morning meditations would be, I think.
JamesRD< I began to say the Lord's prayer every day, and now whenever
I think of it, I say it. It has become a constant with me. In that, it is
a habit.
Lor< I've developed a habit of writing down critical things I need to
do so as not to forget them.
c_breeze< Simple habits like fastening your seat-belt, marking your mileage.
Do it several times, and it is natural.
Ben< Yes, good examples. More?
FRAML< In the Army, I was an artillery forward observer, and I made a
habit of always estimating ranges to objects I saw, either when standing
on a piece of terrain and then comparing it with a map, or when driving
and checking the distance against an odometer. I needed to be able to estimate
the range from me to the target very rapidly and accurately to call in fire
missions. But I have dropped it since I retired. Didn't use it at all at
Gettysburg this weekend ... and don't think I could have accurately guessed
the distances.
dancer< I've read that everything you make yourself do for 30 consecutive
days becomes habit ... like making your bed as soon as you get up.
Bastion4LF< That's a good one, dancer. I'll have to try that.
dancer< Bastion4LF: It does work, as long as you are consistent in the
beginning.
Ben< dancer: Yes, I've read that it takes 30 days to establish a habit,
although some say 23 days.
stormfire< I have created the habit of blessing all road-kill in divine
light and love, and releasing them to continue with their spiritual journey.
*S*
JamesRD< I do that as well, stormfire. *S*
[Ben< stormfire, James RD: That's a good habit! And it can be done elsewhere,
too -- at funerals, for example.]
SLIDER< In my work, which is running heavy equipment, I have to create
habits on each type of equipment I run in order to become proficient --
and at the same time break habits of some equipment in order to run a different
one. Sometimes I change a number of pieces during the day and then back.
Ben< SLIDER: Yes. Building and changing habits is something we can do,
here and now. Habits are conditioned responses. So, yes, we can intentionally
program and reprogram our own subconscious minds.
Ben< After locking myself out of my car three times in two months, I
decided to do something about it. I intentionally built the habit of having
the keys in my hand before closing any door with a lock on it. I did this
by anticipating my feeling of stupidity if I shut that door and then found
I locked myself out, under the general axiom, "I would rather pre-pent
now than re-pent later."
Lor< Ah, Ben: LOL!
MonaHawke< Ben: I got into that habit, too. I won't close any door with
a lock unless I'm looking at the keys in my hand.
SLIDER< Ben: Ha Ha on the keys! I guess I locked myself out enough that
I started carrying two sets of keys. It's a habit now!
Lor< So habits can be creative problem-solvers!
dancer< Ben: Did you find that adding emotional reaction into it strengthened
the habit? Would think that it would.
[Ben< dancer: Yes, adding an emotional component strengthens a habit.]
stormfire< Another one is blessing any fire trucks or ambulances in Divine
love and light for all occupants and participants for their highest good.
*S*
LadyV< stormfire: Surely you make the Almighty smile. What kind thoughts
you have ...
Trudy< Ben: I'm trying to get into the habit of blessing people everywhere
I go. But I don't remember yet to do it all the time.
5foot2< I have made it a habit to try to find a positive point in every
situation, and a habit to keep my sense of humor, especially in situations
that might frustrate or anger. It really has decreased the self-inflicted
stress in my life.
LadyV< I personally have to work at it, and then some ... mostly bad
habits. And dancer had a good point ... 30 days would change most things,
I suppose.
dancer< LadyV: Bad habits are really hard to break ... once it's habit
it becomes so unconscious that I really have to force myself to think about
it to even begin to change it.
LadyV< dancer: That is true.
FRAML< I'm building the habit of doing spiritual clean-outs of my workplace,
the local bar I frequent, battlegrounds.
LadyV< I read in the paper today that with no smoking allowed there are
more fights in the bars. Considered something is not right here. Why bars,
FRAML?
FRAML< LadyV: Re: smoking, just irritability I guess. For me visiting
the bar, I just do it occasionally when the spirit moves me. I ask that
teams of angels be sent to locate any discarnates that are attached to the
customers or the premises, and to clean out any psychic debris in folks.
LadyV< FRAML: Are the visiting discarnates drunk or sober? I ask not
to be flippant, but I want to know. I had not considered a bar to be a place
for this. I will reconsider.
FRAML< LadyV: I don't know what the sobriety of the discarnates is, or
even if they are there. I'm not open to perceiving them. I figure that most
people come into bars to relax, to get away from stress and problems. Also
that some are trying to drink away the problems. So, why not see if there
is anything influencing them that they might not perceive? Think if it as
going where the need is. (Besides, the barmaid has red hair and green eyes.)
LadyV< FRAML: OK, but in Texas if you go in and tell someone they got
company standing beside them, they will put a boot to the seat of your pants.
(laughing) OK, if you say so.
FRAML< LadyV: Well, I just do this quietly while sitting at the bar.
I don't tell anyone I'm doing it, because of a partial expectation of the
reaction you stated, and Jesus's caution about "praying in public only
for notice." I prefer to do things quietly. I'm not in it for the glory.
LadyV< FRAML: You rascal, "glory road" is not your way! Glad
you care enough to try ... and God Bless you for it.
Lor< LadyV: I suspect the discarnates are not drunk -- at least not anymore.
I've heard that former drunks, now discarnate, like to be near incarnate
drunks. Apparently they get some emotional kick and often influence their
host to drink for that reason. Incarnate drunks who have had discarnate
drunks removed from them have been known to stop drinking as long as they
can keep them out.
LadyV< Lor: That is something I do not understand. A person that is drinking
is ill ... chemically. And as for discarnate souls, I don't see them, so
I do not know if they are there or not. Makes me sad to think anyone that
does drink has double trouble.
dancer< FRAML: I can see discarnates. Bars are crawling with them. It's
good that you do clearings when you go there.
Ben< LadyV: Earthbound human ghosts may be bound to a place or a person,
or by their own desire to have or continue to have some kind of experience.
Bars are full of the ghosts of drunks who are trying to possess someone
else's body in order to experience liquor again. It is sad, but true.
LadyV< Ben: Interesting.
Lor< Speaking of spiritual clean-outs, I know people that do that when
they go in churches! Apparently, it can have a positive effect on people's
interactions when done over a period of time.
[Ben< Lor: Good point. That is an excellent habit.]
Ben< ALL: Okay, I have one more subtopic to post for discussion after
the hour, but please feel free to discuss any of the previous subtopics.
Ben< ALL: The third category is: apparently unconditioned response. This
type of response is like a conditioned response, but the source of the conditioning
is unknown. Some examples are phobias, compulsions, obsessions, inhibitions,
addictions. Do you have an example of such a response that you would like
to discuss? YOUR TURN
LadyV< Ben: All that is in the brain chemicals. Take a Prozac ... ends
it all ... that is the recent view anyway. Beats working at it. And did
you know that fear of heights is due sometimes to vision?
Ben< LadyV: As I tried to illustrate with the examples of the pupils
of the eyes and the heart-rate, symptoms can be altered chemically. And
brain chemicals can be released by what one is thinking about. Unless the
cause is actually chemical, taking chemicals is merely an expedient (like
using Belladonna).
Trudy< Ben: Seems to me the more important question would be: How do
we willfully change an unconditioned response, especially when we do not
know the origin?
Ben< Trudy: Your question is right on target. One approach is regression
therapy, including although not necessarily always, past-life regression
therapy. It starts with the symptoms (response) and goes looking for the
cause (i.e., when that response was conditioned).
LadyV< Ben: I did not know that regression would help. Who does this?
Ben< LadyV: Regression Therapy is now a recognized part of Transpersonal
Psychology. Past-life regression therapy is done by some but not all transpersonal
psychologists. The best I know of is Dr. Bill Baldwin.
LadyV< Ben: OK will check it out. Thank you.
SLIDER< I think an unconditioned response for me is when my intuition
-- or sixth sense -- kicks in. Or a guardian angel is telling me the options
and I have to listen real fast!
dancer< phobias ... totally irrational fear of heights and fire ... no
known source.
Lor< My wife closes up whenever we drive over a high bridge. She really
can hardly drive over them herself, so I usually get to do it!
LadyV< Lor: Get her vision checked. One can train the eye to find the
horizon. Pilots have the same problem. She is probably very sick to her
stomach. It's miserable.
stormfire< I find that any unconditioned responses I have were actually
conditioned in early childhood, past experiences, or can be traced to past
life memories.
FRAML< I haven't gotten over a fear of falling. Not heights, but just
the sensation of falling, thus I don't like cable cars and rappelling. Also
learned to be quite Stoic in emotional situations.
SLIDER< I think one has to learn to face their fear of some unconditioned
responses, otherwise known as phobias, in order to understand the fear in
the present time. If we go into past regression on all fears, we only experience
a thought. By experiencing with the physical senses, we can determine if
it is worthy of being feared.
Ben< SLIDER: Yes, many have overcome phobias by facing what they fear.
Thus, they resolve the fear in the present without knowing (or caring) where
it started.
stormfire< SLIDER: When I go into a past life regression, I experience
all the emotions, physical sensations, and mental processes. It is as real
as this is now.
SLIDER< stormfire: I know the feeling -- I'm just with the perspective
that most unconditioned responses that have a negative effect on a person's
daily living should be approached with now time physical senses -- and not
explored with past regression, as this may complicate the problem.
Lor< SLIDER: I agree. Apparently we do not readily remember our past
lives, and this can be a blessing as there are things there that may be
best not remembered now in order to free us to learn better how to interact
with our fellow beings now.
Ben< SLIDER: Good point. The theme for this series is "What can
I do right here, right now?" Some use past-life exploration as an escape
from present problems.
stormfire< SLIDER: I agree that these need to be focused on within this
time reality. Past life regression would be as a last resort if no plausible
explanation in this life could be found. *S*
FRAML< I've got a couple of private foibles that I'm trying to figure
out if they are from past life sources, or just my own warped mind (no,
puns is not one of them). I do know that when I have gotten depressed and
vulnerable, I have been a beacon attracting discarnates who see me as a
target of opportunity to try to control.
LadyV< FRAML: Nobody said any of us were perfect. Good thing I don't
see what is behind me. I don't think I would worry so much about the beyond.
Living in this time-frame is enough for most of us.
stormfire< FRAML: I think that when people are depressed and feeling
vulnerable, they are always a magnet for discarnates.
greyman< stormfire: youbetcha!
LadyV< stormfire: Many religions teach that depression is the work of
Satan. I have often heard this. I have considered that to praise or try
to praise, in sorrow or whatever, being positive puts us more into the light.
Not so easy to do when the heart hurts.
stormfire< LadyV: I've heard that, too. And I also believe that to refocus
the mind on the positives will change the energy level and the attitude.
Even forcing oneself to smile (and hold the smile) in the midst of depression
or anger will react in a happy mood. A good experiment to try for anyone
who wants to. It really works!
stormfire< Ben: Would intense emotions cause a chemical reaction that
changes one's eye color drastically?
Ben< stormfire: I have not heard of intense emotions changing one's eye
*color*. However, I have heard of other very significant biological changes
-- even such things as diminished need for supplementary insulin.
stormfire: Ben: Now you have. My eyes are hazel but they change to brilliant
blue with intense happiness, sadness or anger.
dancer< stormfire: The eye color thing, I don't really know, mine are
very dark to begin with, but I have been told by lots of people that when
I'm angry they are completely black.
LadyV< stormfire: I have seen hazel eyes turn emerald green. Many mystics
do see this. It is again your soul talking. It is a matter of seeing. (smiling)
Ben< stormfire: Oh, I thought you meant a permanent change of eye color.
My eyes are also hazel, and I am told they turn a terrible shade of green
with a certain type of (cold) anger.
stormfire< Ben: In that case I hope I NEVER see your green eyes! *LOL*
SLIDER< Ben: I don't know if this is with the program tonight, but one
facet of life that causes most humans to do conditioned or unconditioned
responses, I think, is a fear of being a failure -- in anything -- and many
will grasp at any chance to try and prove they're not a failure no matter
what the consequence.
LadyV< SLIDER: That is a good point and it is true. It is survival.
stormfire< Survival or society's programming?
LadyV< stormfire: Good point. Society changes belief systems, and often.
Survival is constant.
Ben< SLIDER: A generalized fear of failure can be a response conditioned
by pushy parents. Or teachers. Or priests.
dancer< SLIDER: I think that is very true. My father, IQ in the 180's,
decided to have children only so that the world could have more geniuses
in it. He had three. We range from 168 my brother, 153 me, 149 my sis. He
was so hard on us growing up that we have all become afraid of using the
mind we have, least we disappoint someone by not being bright enough. Fear
of failure is a really debilitating state ... very limiting.
LadyV< dancer: That is sad. Good thing you learned to laugh.
stormfire< dancer: Yes, that is sad. I hope you will go beyond your fear
to realize your full potential ... as we all must. *S*
dancer< LadyV: It's taken a lot ...
LadyV< dancer: Yes, I would imagine it has. Your own little ones will
be blessed because you tried to make it better. It has taken courage, I
know.
dancer< LadyV: Thanks ...
FRAML< I can hear the bells of St. Sealy's pealing for me in the distance.
Good night everyone and remember to count your blessings before you sleep.
LadyV< FRAML: What is St. Sealy?
FRAML< LadyV: I used to work summers during college for the Sealy mattress
company. Thus I make the quip: "St. Sealy's is calling me" for
meaning that it is bedtime.
LadyV< FRAML: And here I thought it was a new Saint I had not heard of.
That is funny.
Ladylucero< FRAML: You got me with that one, too! LOL!
FRAML< Ladies V & Lucero: Of course I could be mistaken, as talking
about the local Belles at an exotic bar ... since I was talking about bars
earlier. *VBG*
LadyV< Ladylucero: Between him and Tigerlily we have a new vocabulary
going. It's good!
Ladylucero< LadyV: Those two are among the most shining lights of this
or any other room!
FRAML< My humble thanks.
LunarLyon< Hello everyone! Am I intruding?
stormfire< LunarLyon: Greetings! Namaste. *S*
Ben< LunarLyon: Hello. Welcome. The seminar is over, and we're just discussing
the general topic of self-control.
LunarLyon< Ahhh ... And?
SLIDER< dancer: I used to try not to be a failure so hard that I made
many mistakes. Then I needed someone to blame them on, which made me sour
and made the ones around me sour. Then one day I realized that ultimately
nothing matters if you are true at heart and lead a positive life -- so
I said to hell with trying not to fail, I'll just progress a little farther
when I learn more and I shall never stop learning.
LadyV< SLIDER: Hey, does that separate the men from the boys, and the
women from the girls? I think so.
dancer< SLIDER: Same here. I am what I am. It's enough.
stormfire< SLIDER: Amen!
Buttonpusher< Greetings all. Sorry I am late. SLIDER: There is no such
thing as failure. It is all life lessons and experiences. VBS
SLIDER< Buttonpusher: Greetings! Yes, that is the point I was trying
to get across. *S* Failure is in the eyes of the beholder!
Ladylucero< SLIDER: Sounds good!
Ben< SLIDER: Someone said the game of life is a lot like the game of
golf -- the harder you try, the worse you do. I think there's some merit
in that idea.
stormfire< Ben: Excellent point! There is something to be said for trying
too hard.
Ben< stormfire: Of course, there is also such a thing as not trying hard
enough, or at all ... but I see fear of failure in more people than I do
laziness or sloth.
SLIDER< Ben: I got humbled at golf real fast two years ago. Ha! The first
time I ever played, I beat two guys that had been playing for years -- I
guess because I wasn't trying that hard, just playing for fun. Haven't been
able to beat them since. LOL
Ben< SLIDER: I gave up the game of golf in 1962 on the third hole at
Torrejon AB, Madrid, Spain. The course went back and forth across a dry
creek-bed in which *every* stone was the same size, shape, and color as
a golf ball. I had lost 2 or 3 balls per hole up to that point. I looked
up from the tee, saw the 19th hole, and said to myself, "That looks
like a lot more fun."
SLIDER< Ben: Well, that means you had more quarters left in your pocket
than golf balls. LOL
stormfire< Ben: Unfortunately, sometimes my fear of failure has an opposite
effect, in that I may not try hard enough. It's some kind of warped reverse
psychology, I convinced myself.
[Ben< stormfire: Sure. Many people have noticed that failure hurts worse
if they tried hard to succeed -- and so some feel: "If I don't try
hard, failure won't hurt."]
stormfire< Ben: Rather I should rephrase that and say fear of rejection
causes me not to try hard enough at times. *S*
Ben< stormfire: Okay ... yes, fear of rejection can have a variety of
effects, and so far as I know, none of them are particularly good for us.
Buttonpusher< stormfire: I have learned long ago that no matter what
you do, someone isn't going to like how you do it. As long as you do, that
is what is important. VBS
stormfire< Ben, Buttonpusher: Ahh, this is true. I now just be as I AM
to the best of my ability and qualities of soul/spirit. Those who are meant
to be near me will, and those that are not, will not. I am happy with myself
and have joy in my heart. This is what matters. *S*
Ben< ALL: Peace and blessings. Goodnight.
10. Circle of Self-Control
Session 3: Sat 09 May 1998
Ben< ALL: Okay. I will post a statement and ask you to illustrate that
statement from your own experience. There will be a total of four such statements,
in two categories.
Ben< First, please draw a square on a piece of paper, and put a upright
cross in it, so it looks like a window-frame with four windows in it (i.e.,
a 2x2 matrix). Across the top, label the two columns "I will"
and "I won't". Down the left side, label the two rows "I
don't want to" and "I want to".
Ben< Note: There is no question of "should" or "should
not" in this exercise. It is merely an exploration (and hopefully,
your illustrations) of some of our human decision-making capabilities. I'll
give you a minute or two to draw the window-frame and label it before I
post the first statement for you to illustrate.
Yopo< Durn, I thought my days of bein' caught in class without a pencil
were over. *LOL*
Ben< ALL: (1) The statement for the upper left window is: "I don't
want to, but I will." Or in the past tense, "I didn't want to,
but I did." Please illustrate this type of decision from your own experience.
YOUR TURN
[No response]
Ben< For example, I didn't want to get up when the alarm clock buzzed
this morning, but I did. (Early but not bright ... bushy-eyed and gummy-toothed.)
Yopo< Ben: I dragged my tired self in to work early Friday morning. Probably
won't want to on Monday, either, but most likely I will. Lots of "responsibilities"
could be dropped in that square.
[Ben< Yopo: Yes. Responsibilities, duties, and any type of self-sacrificial
service.]
FRAML< Ben: Hmmm. Does volunteering to do a job at church because someone
needs to do it and I guess I'm the only person who is willing to be that
someone count? (I'll try to make my next answer more confusing.)
Ben< FRAML: Sure, it counts as an illustration of this type of decision-making
capability.
SLIDER< I didn't want to mow grass today, but I got out the lawn mower
and did it because it needed it. Am I on the right track, Ben?
Ben< SLIDER: Yes! Right track. People tend to overlook things like getting
up in the morning, and mowing the lawn, and changing the baby's diapers.
Khufu< hee hee, Ben ... my thoughts exactly. Every morning, I don't want
to, but I do (have to get up with the baby, change her diaper, give her
breakfast, clean up the mess she makes, etc.) ... every single morning,
because no one else will.
lys< I really don't want to say this, but I will ... and that is, I really
haven't done anything I really didn't want to, but some of the things I
did, I can look back and wish I would of said, "I don't want to."
Lor< I really didn't want to go to a funeral for a neighbor's daughter
that I did not know yesterday, but I did, in deference to my number 3 daughter
who is a good friend and classmate of one of her sisters.
Ben< Okay. Any more illustrations of this one?
Khufu< Yep ... one more that I really didn't want to do, but did anyway
... fold the three piles of laundry hanging around on my bed! (Even though
I was still suffering from yesterday's hay fever attack!)
FRAML< Ben: I had a job I grew to hate, but I didn't quit because it
was the only employment I had. But I did keep looking for another one.
Ben< ALL: The point here is, we *can* do things we don't feel like doing.
That is what is meant by will power.
SLIDER< Ben: Are these illustrations things that one has control over
-- or things that cannot be changed because of other circumstances?
Ben< SLIDER: I'm not asking about "can" or "cannot"
in this exercise, so yes, these illustrations apply to things within your
control.
Ben< ALL: (2) The statement for the upper right window is: "I don't
want to, and I won't." Or in the past tense, "I didn't want to,
and I didn't." Please illustrate this type of decision from your own
experience. YOUR TURN
FRAML< Ben: That one is easy: Jump out of a perfectly good airplane while
it is in the air.
Khufu< heee heee ... today I did not do any major house cleaning that
I usually do on Saturdays ... did not wash the darn floor, nor dust off
the furniture, nor do the washroom, nor pass the vacuum ... and the worst
part is that, for once, I didn't feel guilty about it!
lys< I don't want to do things I don't feel like doing, and I won't.
I just don't have enough time in the days to do what I choose to do.
Yopo< I don't want my thoughts, ideas, etc., to be trapped in the box
of unquestioning conventionality. And if they were, I wouldn't be HERE.
*smile*
lys< Yopo: *smile*
Lor< I plan to redo a VHS tape edit that'll take about another two weeks'
effort, because I am dissatisfied with the low tape quality caused by too
many copies of copies of copies, etc. I feel too embarrassed to send copies
to the many people that want to see what we did on our trip to Greece last
May.
SLIDER< I won't willfully cause harm or distress to another living thing
unless it is completely unavoidable.
Yopo< SLIDER: To the extent that I can control such things, I agree with
you on that one!
lys< SLIDER: *smile*
greyman< One can effectively control "will power" until contact
with an immovable obstacle.
Ben< I don't want to and I won't make promises that I know I can't fulfill.
Lor< I don't want to gamble away my life's savings on the lottery, and
I really don't think I'll do that, so there. There are so many things that
fit in this category!
Ben< ALL: Okay, the point here is, we can refuse, resist, within the
limits of our capabilities. We do not have to always say "yes."
This I call "won't power" (the flip side of will power). And in
fact, won't power is stronger than will power.
lys< I would feel that *will* power were stronger. It just seems more
positive of a vibe for me. I would hope that if I did say *no* people wouldn't
view that as negative? Confusing.
Ben< lys: When we use will power, we usually need to move something or
someone other than ourselves in order to accomplish our purpose. But won't
power can be very nearly immovable, as illustrated by the stubbornness of
donkeys and mules.
lys< Ben: I don't know ... more confusion. Why would I need to move something
outside of myself ... living unconditionally in pure acceptance and in harmony?
I do stuff from within, and without expectation or obligation ... freedom.
It's probably the *words* that are confusing me ... but understand the wave.
Sorry.
FRAML< lys: For example, convincing someone to help you complete a project,
or that there is an easier/better way to accomplish the mission.
lys< FRAML: I don't know. Non-resistance to spirit is my philosophy.
People I have learned are either open or closed to any easier/better way
to accomplish the mission. I won't intrude on free will. And who am I to
*know* really that it is easier or better?
FRAML< lys: If you're in a teamwork situation, all are needed to get
the job done. If there is a way to get it done more efficiently, then, in
my opinion, one is obliged to mention it. That is not infringing on free
will. As an army officer, I had to motivate my men to do things they didn't
think they could do, because the mission required it and because keeping
them alive required me to make them do it.
lys< FRAML: I agree, but if you're working truly as a *team* and *one*,
then it wouldn't much be a matter of convincing others to do something.
Good team players tend to be on the same *wave* and there is no competition.
The level you speak of I can't even image, and I have a lot of respect for
you. So, apples and oranges, maybe.
FRAML< lys: Agreed. Let me pose this to see if we have a common view:
If you saw someone doing an act that could cause them injury or death, would
you warn them to try to prevent it? Or would you still choose not to intervene
with their "free will"? I would intervene.
lys< FRAML: That is a major *tough* question to answer, and something
I am trying to resolve. I look at each individual as a *soul* and each *soul*
learns by experience. As *souls* we are all at different lessons. Those
that murder today might have been the ones sitting in judgment yesterday.
It's all experiences ... this my soul speaks ... but my *humanness* would
try to prevent it ... if it was purely an accidental thing ... but if someone
was *choosing* to do themselves harm, I think my *soul* would step in and
say "Who are you to judge and stop an experience? Did you NOT touch
the hot burner when you were a child because you were told NOT to?"
It's confusing, FRAML. I realize things at soul level ... but the humanness
... I am in physical form ... tough to resolve.
Yopo< lys: Military life tends to render a lot of "I want to's"
and "I don't want to's" irrelevant, of necessity.
lys< Yopo: I have a hard time imaging military life. I could not deal
with it at all. Those that do and can really blow my mind ... much discipline.
Lor< Ben: I agree about "won't" power being rather powerful.
SLIDER< Ben: "Won't Power" is sure harder to blend into everyday
life, sooo many choices!
greyman< One can effectively control "won't power" until contact
with an immovable obstacle.
lys< greyman: *smile*
Ben< greyman: True, there are forces and resistances outside of our circle
of self-control. Right now, I'm looking within that circle, at capabilities
often overlooked.
Ben< ALL: (3) The statement for the lower left window is: "I want
to, and I will." Or in the past tense, "I wanted to, and I did."
Please illustrate this type of decision from your own experience. YOUR TURN
FRAML< Easy. I joined the army (well, I sort of felt I had to for personal
reasons of self-proof) but applying for and accepting a commission.
Ben< I wanted to take my grandchildren to the petting zoo, and I did,
and I'm *glad* I did!
Lor< Well, I wanted to get married to my wife, and I am still particularly
glad that I did! *s*
lys< I wanted to do something really *fun* and *crazy* and I will be
landing in Seattle on May 19th and driving cross country with a *friend*
I met in SWC, and I can't stop laughing. This is going to be one heck of
a trip!
SLIDER< I wanted to enjoy that first cup of coffee in the morning, and
I did.
Yopo< I wanted to learn to play the guitar. Wanted to find local like-minded
folks. Wanted to listen to the Grateful Dead sitting on the grass under
a full moon. *sigh* I want to see Stonehenge ... I'm gonna do that, too.
lys< Yopo: (*big sigh*) ... miss those days ... but we can still listen
under the full moons ... liked-minded folks ... we are everywhere!
Yopo< lys: ***smile***
Lor< I want to stop putting off writing a report that I need to write
before it becomes OBE (overtaken by events), so I hope I get it out of the
way as soon as I get other promised things out of the way.
Ben< ALL: The point here is, we humans can *initiate* actions that would
not occur without us, as an exercise of our own free will.
greyman< Capabilities are sometimes limited by imagination.
lys< greyman: That's one for the fridge!
SLIDER< greyman: Capabilities can be limited by lack of imagination,
also. *S*
Ben< greyman: Yes, In my opinion, capabilities are often limited by imagination
("Gee, I couldn't do that") -- and even more often, by lack of
imagination ("Gee, I didn't know I could do that").
Yopo< Imagination strikes me as one of our most wonderful tools. EVERYTHING
made by man first exists in the imagination.
greyman< Becoming an uncaused cause, sometimes does not require much
imagination.
island< Ben: Sorry, I missed a great deal of this conversation, but what
I see is great. Thanks.
Ben< ALL: (4) The statement for the lower right window is: "I want
to, but I won't." Or in the past tense, "I wanted to, but I didn't."
Please illustrate this type of decision from your own experience. YOUR TURN
FRAML< Yes, restraint in yelling at someone because they cut you off
in traffic.
Khufu< I wanted to telephone my boarder on his cell phone when he left
for work at 5.30 am this morning, to tell him that he forgot to turn off
the stove light, the basement lights, the TV, the entrance doorway light
and lock the front door ... but I didn't ... would of probably pissed him
off so early in the morning.
Yopo< Hmm. There's some sorta relationship between the upper left box
and the bottom right. Leastwise for me.
[Ben< Yopo: Yes. Very perceptive. I'll focus on that in my summary.]
SLIDER< I want to go out on the interstate and really smoke the tires
and see how fast my truck will go -- but I won't -- damn highway patrol!
greyman< SLIDER: zacktly!
lys< As a kid I always said I wanted to, but I didn't. I couldn't come
out with the truth that I didn't want to, so I didn't. But NOW ... hahahah
... no problems. If I want to do something, I will, and if I don't, I won't.
Lor< I have thought about trying out Viagra, but have resisted the "urge"
so far.
lys< haahahahahha
SLIDER< Lor: Only in the nineties, recreational drugs by prescription.
HA HA
Lor< SLIDER: That wouldn't be an obstacle in my case, as my Doctor has
even suggested it! *LOL*
greyman< SLIDER: The new buzz phrase: "Don't forget Viagra when
goin' to Niagara."
island< I have of late had the desire to be totally honest with a friend,
but didn't, mainly because she said she wants distance and boundaries. So
I guess I have to respect that even though what she says and does hurts.
Ben< ALL: Okay, the point here is, we are capable of self-restraint.
We don't have to go along with every whim. We can recognize and reject temptations,
according to our own concepts of right and wrong.
SLIDER< Ben: The only problem here is that we get into sociology and
have to follow the laws that man has established -- those same laws have
instilled fear of reprisal and taken some of our "free will" away
and made us chose "free won't" or face the consequences!!
Ben< SLIDER: Yes, as soon as we look *outside* of our own circle of self-control,
we encounter the rest of the universe, including nature and its laws, society
and its laws, etc.
greyman< Ben: 286,282 MPH ... it's the law in a vacuum!
SLIDER< greyman: You lost me on the vacuum speed -- is that max speed,
or all we can obtain at this time?
greyman< SLIDER: Speed of light in 3-space vacuum.
Ben< SUMMARY: We have barely scratched the surface of decision-making;
but we have looked at two types of self-discipline (upper left and lower
right), and two types of self-indulgence (upper right and lower left), without
saying that either self-discipline or self-indulgence is always good or
bad, right or wrong. We are capable of making these four types of decisions.
Yopo< Ben: Discipline and indulgence, devoid of moral polarity. So the
rightness and wrongness is somewhere "outside" our box. Hmm ...
greyman< Yopo: Bingo!
FRAML< Yopo: To me those four are central to the decisions I make in
deciding which square I place my answer in.
Ben< Yopo: Rightness and wrongness are outside *this* box (decision matrix),
but they are (or can be) within our circle of self-control. We can inherit,
or select, or invent concepts of right and wrong, and then use them in making
decisions.
Lor< Ben: It seems to me that some of our toughest choices are in selecting
one of two or more beneficial things when they are mutually incompatible,
and conversely, one of two or more undesirable things when at least one
must be selected.
Ben< Lor: Yes, some of our toughest choices are those *within* our control.
The types of problems you described are largely due to conflicting ideals.
SLIDER< Ben: As Lor just commented, it comes down to decision-making
at each and every waking moment. Then to come full circle, it's a matter
of morals, and laws -- natural or man-made -- hopefully with divine guidance
--- then to be comfortable with one's decisions.
Yopo< I find I tend to see self-discipline itself in a positive moral
light, and to be a bit skeptical about self-indulgence. Must be the residual
effects of my Puritanical ancestors.
FRAML< Yopo: I think self-discipline is not necessarily from "Puritanical
ancestors", but from a need to control ourselves for our own survival
-- literally life or death decisions, and also how we interact with others.
Yopo< FRAML: Point well-taken.
Ben< Yopo: Self-discipline is seldom popular, because most people want
what they want when they want it. Self-indulgence is always popular, for
the same reason, and it goes by many other names. But severe self-discipline
(austerities, such as practiced by the monastics of all religions) can be
foolishly self-destructive, in my opinion.
lys< Well, with self-indulgence and self-discipline there is a balance
within. Geez, my resolution for '98 was to live a hedonistic lifestyle and
experience 24/7. I went through the eastern purification for years and denial
of senses. So, time for self-indulgence. Anything *good* we were told was
bad. Think about it. Just basic things.
[Ben< lys: Yes, balance is needed. An extremely self-disciplined life
can be harsh, joyless, no fun at all. But an extremely self-indulgent life
can be robot-like slavery to one's inner feelings, emotions, whims. Rejecting
both of these extremes means choosing some of each, so a balanced life consists
of many, many choices between self-discipline and self-indulgence.]
Ben< ALL: My basic theme for tonight was: The most important control
we have is self-control, and the truest mastery is self-mastery.
FRAML< Ben: Agreed. And for me that includes the discipline and morality
that I have internalized as a part of me and thus is within and outside
of the 4 rooms you began with.
Ben< /topic OPEN
lys< Lor: Could you give an example of what you said about tough choices
... the more undesirable things or side of it?
Lor< lys: I once did not force a brilliant friend and associate of mine
to stop drinking even when he became an alcoholic, in deference to his free
will and self-respect. In retrospect, I deeply regret not having done so,
for I allowed him to cause himself such fantastic pain when his liver quit
passing blood while his heart still kept pumping blood to the point that
he bloated up like a pregnant woman and the pressure caused his brain to
become deranged. I sense that had I used more maturity and literally forced
him to quit, he'd still be alive today.
Yopo< Lor: Seems to me we can seldom "make" anybody do anything.
Ben< Yopo: Yes, we can seldom make anybody do or not do anything, but
we can try to persuade, and we can sometimes use force if necessary. Conversely,
others can seldom make us do or not do anything, but they can try to persuade
us, and some of them can use force if they deem it necessary. This is the
picture of "won't power" in the real world.
lys< Lor: Your friend needed the experience. Is anything inherently good
or bad, when you look from a spiritual light? If we are all experiencing,
your friend taught you many lessons as well as others and learning himself.
I believe we create our own realities 24/7 ... and there is so much order
and sense to this universe. With your friend's experience, now you KNOW
you would step in, but don't beat yourself up because you needed the experience
fully to learn. It served many purposes. The key is we keep RE--re-ACTing,
REmembering ... what does RE mean? to get back ... so we're all getting
there.
Khufu< lys: What do you mean by 24/7? Is this a date for something?
lys< Khufu: 24/7 means 24 hours a day, 7 days a week ... our message
of linear time in this *place*. hahaha
Khufu< OK (LOL)! I was wondering there. It's also my birthday (that's
why I was curious).
Lor< The lesson I learned with my friend was: there are situations that
demand that we at least attempt to prevent someone from harming themselves
by even using force because we do care so much. I have some sense of relief
in that I was at least able to help him go to the light some months after
he died.
Lioness< Lor: You think the soul can be hurt?
Lor< Lioness: Have you never been hurt -- I mean other than by physical
pain? I sense that our souls are yet another form, not yet understood, certainly
not by scientists -- not electric or magnetic, but consisting of still another
form of fundamental substance, not subject to the limitations we know apply
to electromagnetic energy. For example, no time or space constraints, no
speed of light constraints, etc.
FRAML< lys: Are you a parent?
lys< We're all parents, FRAML. We're all teachers and students ... whatever
... ya know. If I saw a child being hurt, I would step in. If I saw abuse
I would speak up. That is my humanness, even though my soul will whisper,
"There is no such thing as victims."
FRAML< lys: To me, you are evading the question with "we are all
parents, etc." Being a parent instills certain "soul" controlled
guidance in me on how I teach my daughters, protect them from harm. Also,
in my view, the society today has tried to make everyone a victim, thus
resulting in the attitude that "I'm not responsible for my own actions."
Yopo< FRAML: Well said! I think we are ultimately responsible for our
every action.
FRAML< Yopo: Thank you. Here in DC, I hear folks on talk radio blaming
everyone but themselves for their problems, and asking others to provide
the solutions "Because that is the job of (fill in the blank)."
Self-responsibility went down the tubes as we have shifted to the concept
of "It's society's fault". And who is society but each of us?
[Ben< "Everything" and "nothing" are the two extremes
of a duality. One extreme says we are responsible for everything that happens
to us -- there are no victims. The other extreme says we are not responsible
for anything that happens to us -- we are all victims. The middle way says
we are responsible for some of the things that happen to us, and sometimes
we actually are innocent victims.]
lys< FRAML: I agree. We are responsible for what we choose to do. We
always have choice as to how we respond and react. I was just pointing out
the conflict of being in physical body, but realizing FULLY your essence
is LOVE ... no duality. And all essence is LOVE. Every single one of us
is just having a human experience and learning. And someday, I see the masses
awakened to the fact that they are LOVE. Then all this humanness that is
so weird ... ahhh ... lost it.
Ben< lys: Good comment on humanness. I believe humanness is a condition
not to be despised but eventually (gently and systematically) transcended.
Lioness< Ben: Yes, the darker side of humanness can be transcended, but
what about the good side of it? To be human is to make mistakes, but only
by trial and error can we evolve into better, for that is the only way Life
teaches. In all things, evolution, from worse to better, from better to
worse, from simpler to complex and visa versa, from one form to another,
adaptation is the human condition ... that is what defines humanness ...
adaptivity to our surroundings, not just responding as animals do or nature
does, but acting from will ... thus we are balanced.
Yopo< Ben: Almost makes humanhood in general sound like a negative thing.
(I know you don't really mean it that way.) Uh, surely some of our human
qualities are gonna be of great value, even when we drop our monkey-bodies
off in the costuming dept.
Ben< Yopo: In my opinion, humanness is not spiritually negative, but
neutral. There are higher and lower forms of life than human (incarnate
or discarnate).
Yopo< Ben: We're talking of humanness as our collection of biological
urges, learned and instinctual responses, etc.? As parts of the "costume"?
Ben< Yopo: I was speaking of humanness as a combination of spiritual
and material, a soul operating a physical body, and not merely the physical
costume.
Yopo< Ben: So I thought. Just wanted to be sure. It's difficult for me,
though, to imagine the state of my spirit divorced from the body. Even dreaming,
there is a sort of body we are in, and though many physical limitations
have fallen away, the issues are still issues relating to the physical.
When ALL those issues are removed, I wonder what we are dealing with?
Lioness< Ben: Could humanness be defined as middle of the road? For to
be successful is to be adaptive, is to be middle of the road and stay that
way, but accumulating what we have learned and what we are learning ...
adaptivity in constant acting evaluation.
Ben< Lioness: Yes, I find humans to be mid-astral beings. However, we
not only adapt ourselves to our environment; we persistently attempt to
alter our environment to suit ourselves.
Lioness< Ben: True, midway, but to be perfect in oneness (this is just
a viewpoint) could be to exist in perfect balance with everything, for neither
the body nor the soul was made to be without the other ... but because of
the misalignment long ago, they have become out of sync with each other,
and the physical body matures much faster than the soul because it is no
longer eternal. It lost that eternal condition long ago when our beings
became misaligned ... but we have adapted around that because when we die,
our soul (physical, it is) is mature enough to exist in physical form in
it's own physical state, but the body is simply a reflection, a housing,
for the emergence, like the development of a butterfly. It doesn't die;
it just changes form, but stays physical all the same.
lys< Lioness: Wonderful! Thank you for sharing that thought. I am living
non-resistant to spirit, and I can say of the aging factor ... ha ... I
feel as if I could live forever. I like how you put that ... and WOW ...
I would LOVE to live a long, long time, and right now ... so far so good
... haven't aged a day in almost 15 years!
FRAML< Lioness, lys: I guess I don't apply a physical aspect to my soul,
or the term as I define it. It is the spark of life within me. Yes, there
may be an aura around me, but that, to me, is ethereal, not physical. Physical
means my body, or a rock, or a hunk of steel.
Lioness< FRAML: I have always learned the way of the Eternal Balance,
for one cannot exist without the other.
FRAML< Lioness: I guess I'm rather dense on this one. Eternal balance
where? Is there a when?
Lioness< FRAML: Eternal Balance is more than a process, it's a condition,
a state of being in which the soul is in the process of constant transformation
and growing, but always in balance with the body surrounding it, for that
is where the process begins. When the soul and body are in sync (which can
be achieved easily in life) then the positive being emerges ... simply,
the positive feeling-good person.
lys< FRAML: On a subconscious level ... beyond the words ... I think
we're feeling the same thing. My spirit is a spark ... and it burns.
FRAML< lys: To me, the "spark" is the source that gives this
body life. It does not burn as fire. It is "breathed" into us
(meaning of spirit). When the body dies, the "breath of life"
departs, both as physically ceasing to breathe and our soul also departs.
Lioness< FRAML: I have always known that death is but a phase of existence,
like evolution in a way, but physical life exists after death because that
is when the entire being is balanced and fully mature (example: a soul,
spirit being physically able to lift objects).
FRAML< Lioness: "Physical life exists after death"? Death of
the body or of the soul? I don't understand your concept.
Lioness< FRAML: Death of neither, but the accumulation of the two parts
of existence into one eternal balance. Simply, the union of the two into
one complete, balanced being. A soul is just as physical as the real body,
it can be touched, felt.
Ben< Lioness: I consider souls to be spiritual, not material. They are
not subject to the laws of physics or material space-time.
Lioness< Ben: I respect your view. I have learned there are different
states of physical form, like solid, liquid, gas. Same goes for the soul,
still spiritual and physical, but instead of being in a solid body, it's
like gas ... if you follow me ... but still physical.
lys< Lioness: Keep communicating ... your words are flowing like majick
right now and it's wonderful feeling them ... thanks x eternity :)
Lioness< lys: The physical body is a part of you, but also, it is just
a reflection of your true being form ... like kids who die at birth or early
in life ... they don't stop spiritually growing, learning and developing
simply because they "died" ... they take a different route in
being maturity, as many beings do, but in the end we all get there, no matter
the path. Their soul/physical form is the true self and their physical body
was just a reflection, but like a broken or distorted mirror, some of our
bodies are distorted (deformed), in some cases reflections of our true soul
form and some do not reflect the true soul form. That is why, when a child
dies, their soul form continues to develop normally because they are not
affected by diseases, scars, and can grow perfectly healthy.
FRAML< Lioness: Have you developed the concept you are explaining to
us yourself, or through study? If so, what have you studied?
lys< Lioness: kewl. Basic Spirituality 101 along the path that I walk.
Got anything above and beyond ... move the classroom from kindergarten up
to 12th grade level, if you know what I mean. Thanks.
Lioness< lys: Thanx, friend. Creation in constant manifestation experiencing.
lys< Lioness: Yup ... and it is really fun to create and manifest and
ride that wave. Life is excellent!
Ben< Lioness: You seem to be using the word "physical" the
way I use the word "real." A spiritual body is real, but it isn't
a physical body.
Lioness< Ben: In a sense yes, in a sense both. I use the spectrum of
the definition in which I understand it to apply what it means ... like
a glass half full or half empty ... it's both, but either/or depending on
how you look at it. "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly
on our own point of view."
FRAML< Ben: I agree with your definition.
lys< FRAML: Remember there is no right or wrong definition. You may resonate
with someone else's thoughts ... and that is kewl. We all listen to a somewhat
different drummer. My soul is burning like fire ... it is creation ... hard
to explain my *reality* in mere mortal words without really losing the feeling
and intensity.
[Ben< Hmm. If there were no right or wrong definitions, communication
would be impossible. And even though we have consensus definitions in dictionaries,
semantic confusion makes communication difficult.]
FRAML< lys: I do see definite "rights and wrongs" in this world,
in morality, ethics (not situational), and definitions by which we use words
to communicate our ideas.
Lioness< FRAML: Could the defined rights and wrongs be just descriptive
points in which we choose which parameters apply?
lys< FRAML: Oh, my humanness definitely agrees with you from physical/human
body, but when I look from soul eyes, I know this is just an illusion. My
*soul* is eternal. It will not fade and *die* ... but my body ... am very
grounded within it ... and KNOW what I can and can't do with it.
Lioness< lys: Why do you refer to yourself as "it" like your
soul is a thing? It is you, not an it. Your soul has a name, your name,
your soul is your being is what you are.
lys< Lioness: Okay, this time I'm lyssa, soooo, in this physical body
you could call my soul lys.
[The following conversation actually began earlier, but sometimes it is
impossible to organize several parallel conversations into a single linear
transcript.]
lys< When you're talking spiritual ... the source there is not negative
or positive, it just IS. Being here in physical, we can intellectualize
all this spiritual to the best of our abilities, but we are really only
going to KNOW when we experience it ... or know our own experience of it
... but spiritual just is ... no duality, at least that's what I sense about
it ... and I will say I could be completely and utterly wrong, but right
now it makes sense to me.
greyman< lys: Ripples never come back (Genesys 1976).
Lor< lys: Wasn't it the Buddha who indicated that the old ideas of duality
were flawed, in that reality generally has a much wider spectrum that exists
between two extremes -- like many shades of gray between black and white?
Lioness< Lor: That is what I mean, the two points of duality are black
and white with the rest of the spectrum thrown in between.
lys< Lor: I studied that long ago and so can't really *remember* who
said what! But sounds correct. My mind is no longer *great* with remember
all the details ... more into *being* and *experiencing* now than *thinking*
about it all!
Lor< lys: I am concerned that you seem unaware of the dangers of choosing
to be open even to malevolent spirits that would cause you pains of many
dimensions.
lys< Lor: I don't *believe* in malevolent spirits, so therefore they
would not *manifest* in my *reality*. I am *open* and *open* to the Source
which is Love. Soooo ... don't worry about me ... I am in full wisdom of
what I am partaking.
Yopo< lys: Hmm... Stuff I don't believe in occasionally turns up. *smile*
lys< Yopo: hmmm... Sure you're not giving it *belief*? If you're talking
spiritual beings ... in spirit you realize that the projections of *evil*
or that *duality* is created from your own mind stuff ... for some, the
*reality* of malevolent beings. I don't deny that for them ... just not
my reality is all I'm saying.
Yopo< lys: I suppose there is some "level" where one may rise
above duality, good and evil, etc., but down here where I live there seems
to be plenty of dark energy about. If you've found a way to exclude it from
your reality, more power to ya!
lys< Yopo: In the *now* I am really putting out the love 24/7 and the
peace. I don't deny what is *reality* manifesting here in the physical that
I can see with my human eyes at all, but I am thinking love all the time
and it is being mirrored back to me. Seems what I put out is what I get
back ... so I think positive and good thoughts.
Lor< lys: Apparently you just have not yet encountered people that have
suffered from actions of malevolent spirits even though they did not believe
such spirits existed in anyone's reality.
lys< Lor: I don't deny other people's experiences of malevolent beings,
but I would disagree ... and that's just my opinion ... that they didn't
NOT have belief in them at all. I myself have no *fear* when I am out there.
If the like vibes are attracting the like vibes of LOVE ... maybe I'm just
getting lucky ... but then again, I don't believe in luck at that level.
To each his own ...
SLIDER< Ben: I've spoken to you before about a spark of light while in
the OB state -- can you define in your words how that spark relates to the
soul? I feel it is concentrated energy that makes up the spirit/soul --
intelligent energy -- can you comment?
Ben< SLIDER: I find that a soul can take many forms or shapes, but its
most basic form is a spark of spirit-light.
stormfire< Ben: I often see it as a brilliant electric blue light.
Lioness< Ben: AMEN, brother Ben, to that one! I firmly believe that a
mature soul can choose a form!
Yopo< Ben: Interesting. I haven't had many conscious encounters with
discarnate beings, but one certainly involved something along those lines.
I was drifting off toward sleep, and managed to balance in between for a
time. I was suddenly surrounded by a "swarm" of small glowing
spheres. Recognized them as being "alive" and was VERY startled.
I demanded "Who are you?" (with a certain note of fear, I must
confess), and they took off like a flock of sparrows.
[Ben< Yopo: Maybe they *were* a flock of sparrows. *smile*]
SLIDER< Ben: Yes, my thoughts are the same as you and Yopo on the shape
or form. I was interested if you had any insight as to the natural or traveling
shape of a soul/spirit ?
Ben< SLIDER: The most natural shape seems to be the point or spark of
light. Next most natural, a sphere, like a fat star if radiant, or a black
ball if absorbing energy. Then thought-form shapes and projections of all
sorts, including human or humanoid.
SLIDER< Ben: Then I would expect that an astral traveling soul/spirit
would have full mastery of the power of photons -- being able to absorb
or expel light??
Ben< SLIDER: Spiritual light and physical light are not the same. For
example, the Source of the Spirit-Light isn't our neighborhood star, Sol.
SLIDER< Ben: Yes, I understand the difference. I guess I'm confused as
to when in physical or OB one can see the same sparks. Would that be the
manifestation control of the spark in question? or are there laws of physics
in third dimension that would dictate this?
Ben< SLIDER: We see spirit-sparks by clairvoyance either in our bodies
or out of our bodies. (If you are in your body and see them with your eyes
closed, you are seeing them clairvoyantly and they aren't radiating physical
light.)
SLIDER< Ben: I see them with my eyes open and closed -- just trying to
find a correlation to understand why. *S*
Ben< SLIDER: From our earlier conversations, I have gathered that you
are unusually clairvoyant. When you see something with eyes open and closed,
notice what does and does not vanish when you close your eyes.
SLIDER< Ben: I'll keep better track of such experiences, as I'm usually
a bit surprised myself when something that has happened to me, unexplainable
at the time, becomes explainable with understanding and talking to others
with similar experiences.
lys< People wonder why the great experiment failed? If all those people
were living that great experiment 24/7 then it would be a reality 24 hours
a day 7 days a week. I live that 24/7. If something *negative* were to occur,
I would *choose* to see it in a different light and realize that the duality
is irrelevant and the experience that is important to me ... just my opinion
...
greyman< lys: Has it failed?
lys< greyman: I just has a lot of love in my heart and try to pour that
into the brain and everything else about my physical. Others tell me to
take off the rose-colored glasses before I'm hurt ... but hey, I'm happy
and smiling and laughing and just having a good time, so my reality others
might find unrealistic, but it keeps me balanced. :)
Yopo< lys: I do believe our beliefs create our reality. I just think
my reality is a shared place, so the beliefs of others shape my reality
as well.
lys< Yopo: The only thing is, I have moved to a space that I won't let
*others* beliefs shape my reality as I choose to *re-act* to situations.
I refuse to give others power over me to get me to *react* negatively. I
understand what you're saying, but we can separate our own *inner* realities
and then manifest them outwardly, and not just *act* and *re-act* like others'
realities that may not be right for us. I'm tired ... sorry if I'm making
no sense.
Yopo< lys: You're coming through loud and clear. And I know there's truth
in what you're sayin'. *s*
lys< Yopo :)
[Ben< Hmm. Yes. We can separate our inner realities from external reality.
And it can be a sort of self-control: the artificial elevation of one's
own mood by selective affirmation and denial, regardless of external reality
and regardless of what anyone else believes. This type of thinking releases
feels-good brain chemicals just as thinking about pickles releases saliva.
One can be addicted to those chemicals.]
Ben< Yopo: Good point about shared reality. There are some sentient beings
(like the grizzly bear, for example) whose beliefs create a reality in which
we are their lunch.
[Ben< While editing this transcript, I remembered an encounter I once
had with a tiger in a zoo. He was standing close to the bars of his cage,
looking out, and he seemed to be bored. When our eyes met, he thought-at-me,
"I could eat you." I was startled to hear his thought in my mind,
involuntarily took half a step backward, but then stopped, maintained eye
contact, and thought-at-him, "Yes... And then many of my kind would
come, and hunt you down, and bind you, and kill you." The tiger blinked
his eyes very rapidly, took two steps backward, lowered his head, and then
turned his head and eyes away from me. I turned my head and eyes away from
him, but watched him with my peripheral vision. He glanced at me, then turned
away, walked to the back of his cage, and lay down. When our eyes met, he
blinked both eyes, slowly, once -- so I also blinked both eyes, slowly,
once. He looked away from me, stretched, and began licking the back of one
front paw. A negotiated peace. But, except for the fact that he was in a
cage, this encounter might have had a different ending.]
lys< Yopo: Today I was pondering RE. We are re-doing, re-incarnating,
re-acting, re-membering. What does RE mean? going back to a former state
or condition? Well ... hmmm ... I rather choose to just BE. I'm just tired
... soul wise, physical wise ... too tired to keep thinking about all this.
I have been moving into the space of just experiencing and enjoying whatever
unfolds and TRUSTING in spirit to take me to where I need to be, and knowing
I will ALWAYS have EVERYTHING I NEED ... No more, No LESS ... in every moment.
This is *me* at this *moment* of time.
[Ben< Hmm. RE means "back" or "again". In this case,
perhaps, a turning back from laborious self-discipline to hedonistic self-indulgence.
Now this soul is tired. Perhaps what sounds like affirmations of bliss is
actually a spiritual cul-de-sac.]
Yopo< lys: I think about this stuff as a form of re-creation. When I
get a headache, I stop for a while. *s*
lys< Yopo: The energies I lend my thoughts to these day are Love and
all variations thereof. When it comes to burning the brain, I've just moved
into the space of putting it all down and wanting to LIVE instead of spinning
the endless questions. I've been spinning them for years ... hehehe ...
just need a vacation for a few. hahah
Yopo< lys: Like Ram Dass says: just "Be Here Now." It is a
wonderful way to live, I'm sure. A wonderful purity about it. But I'm forever
pulling the past into the present, and trying to pull the future here, too.
My Now is composed of that stuff as much as the contents of the moment.
And HEY! If the present is where the past and future meet, it's nothing
but a non-existent boundary anyhow. How can I possibly cram all of my stuff
into such a narrow spot?
lys< Yopo: "Be here now" has been spoken since the beginning
of time ... same *thought* different words to express. That's what I love
about all this. And on another note I love: poets know ... scientists are
just learning.
Yopo< Ben: I conceive of the entire Universe as existing as a dream in
the mind of Creator. Does that metaphor make sense to you? That ALL is but
a dream, but the dream is as real as it gets? Then it sort of follows that
we co-create in our own minds. Our own dreams are instrumental.
Ben< Yopo: I have heard it said that all reality is merely a dream --
the Creator's or our own -- but I do not know that to be true. On the other
hand, I do know the difference between my own dreams, my own waking state,
and my own (several) altered states of consciousness.
greyman< Yopo: Golly, what happens when the Creator wakes up!
Yopo< I hope Creator doesn't get lonely. Must be lonely at the top.
lys< Yopo: More fun ... alone, lonely ... alONE and lONEly ... hehehhe
... no such thing as being *alone* or *lonely* when we are ALLONE!
stormfire< lys: Thanks. I'd never viewed the word "alone" in
that way before. Funny how the simplest things can hide from us. *S*
greyman< Yopo: Makes ya wonder why we are in existence.
Yopo< greyman: It's just the only game in town.
Lor< Yopo: Perhaps our universe is not a dream as such but the result
of highly intense directed thoughts from God. No one that I know of conjectures
that God needs to sleep as we mortals do, so why must we try to characterize
God based on our limited selves?
Yopo< Lor: Wasn't meaning to imply God has fallen asleep on the job!
*s* I meant "dream" more in the sense that consciousness is the
ultimate ground of being. Specifically, Creator's consciousness. We are
like cast-off rays of light, or sparks rising from the Fire.
Lor< Yopo: Regarding it being lonely at the top, I've heard it expressed
that is the reason that God created us in his image, as it has been said,
and grants us so much loving care, always protecting our rights to a free
will, so that after we eventually learn to get along well enough with one
another to be entrusted to live together amicably as spirits together in
heaven, each with a wonderfully different background of experiences and
personalities, we would form a fascinating community of spirits interacting
with each other and with him and enjoying all the exciting possibilities
that creative power might conceive.
SLIDER< Lor: That was a great way of putting things -- at least for those
of us that follow that line of thought. *S*
Yopo< Lor: An interesting idea! I hope Creator will be patient with us.
*smile*
10. Circle of Self-Control
Session 4: Sat 16 May 1998
Ben< ALL: Tonight I would like to look at the perimeter of our individual
circles of self-control. This perimeter functions very much like the semi-permeable
membrane that forms the cell wall of a single-celled organism, but unlike
the lower forms of life, we can fairly well control what we do and do not
receive (intake), and what we do and do not transmit (output).
Ben< ALL: To explore this semi-permeable interface between our inner
world and the world around us, I will post a question for you to answer
from your experience. After you have responded, I may add a comment or observation
before posting the next question. And although this is a huge subject area,
I will limit myself to four questions (two in each of two categories).
Ben< ALL: (1) Have you been lied to (where the other person knew that
what he or she said was not true)? If so, did you accept (believe) the lie?
And if you believed it, how did you discover that it was not true? YOUR
TURN
Lotus< Yes. It was not congruent with what had been spoken.
Azriel< Yes, and I've believed and also doubted. "The truth will
out" has usually given light to the deception!
Ben< Azriel: Good point. Believing, doubting, and disbelieving are among
the options within our circle of self-control. All three are things we can
choose to do.
FRAML< Yes, my ex-wife ... when she moved out and in with the guy she
had been sleeping with while I was on field duty in the Army.
Ben< FRAML: I take it that her actions spoke more truly than her words?
FRAML< Ben: I didn't know it was going on until I came home from Duty
NCO and found a note on the refr